2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review and analysis of biomass gasification models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
324
0
18

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 688 publications
(348 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
6
324
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…The kinetic rate models are more accurate and computationally intensive. However, their applicability is limited to specific plants (Puig-Arnavat et al, 2010). Most of the chemical process simulation tools like Aspen Plus which build up a model from the first principle's approach have a higher computational burden.…”
Section: Methods Of Genetic Programming Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The kinetic rate models are more accurate and computationally intensive. However, their applicability is limited to specific plants (Puig-Arnavat et al, 2010). Most of the chemical process simulation tools like Aspen Plus which build up a model from the first principle's approach have a higher computational burden.…”
Section: Methods Of Genetic Programming Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomass gasification is a complex thermochemical process (Puig-Arnavat et al, 2010). In the recent past, numerous researchers have tried to simulate a realistic gasification process and optimized the process analysis to make it more cost effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach is independent of the gasifier type, being suitable to study the influence of operating parameters on the gaseous product composition of the process (PuigArnavat et al, 2010). According to Puig-Arnavat et al (2010), the largest discrepancies between predictions of equilibrium models and the corresponding values from actual gasification systems are found under low gasification temperatures. As a result, CO and H 2 contents are typically overestimated and CO 2 , CH 4 , tar and char contents are underestimated.…”
Section: Thermodynamic Equilibrium Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermodynamic equilibrium modeling offers simplicity and requires only chemical reaction equilibrium data. The equilibrium approach is not dependent on flow regime or mixing or residence time, and assumes that all the gas-phase shift reactions reach equilibrium, thereby overestimating syngas quality and carbon conversion (Puig-Arnavat et al, 2010). Chemical kinetic modeling requires more data (chemical kinetics, gasifier dimensions, and flow regime) and is more complicated.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%