2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.yofte.2015.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review and comparative assessment of FDMA-PON vs. TDMA-PON for next-generation optical access networks

Abstract: We present in this paper a comparative assessment of Time Division Multiple Access Passive Optical Networks (TDMA-PON) and Frequency-Division Multiple Access Passive Optical Networks (FDMA-PON). We try to point out the pros and cons of the two different approaches in the context of very high capacity next-generation PON mainly in terms of physical layer transmission performances, but also introducing some comparison in terms of complexity, cost and power consumption.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting decoded signal is detected in ONU receiver section. The receiver section of CO in DN transmission consists of PIN photodiode, low pass filter (LPF), 3R regenerator and bit error rate analyzer (BER) 1,3,12 …”
Section: Architecture Of Ng‐pon2 Using 2d Spectral/spatial Swzcc Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting decoded signal is detected in ONU receiver section. The receiver section of CO in DN transmission consists of PIN photodiode, low pass filter (LPF), 3R regenerator and bit error rate analyzer (BER) 1,3,12 …”
Section: Architecture Of Ng‐pon2 Using 2d Spectral/spatial Swzcc Codementioning
confidence: 99%