2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2020.102119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review and comparison of methods to model ship hull roughness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fuel cell was tested with three different cathode configurations [8]. As noted in [31], this roughness ε (FC) is not a real measurable physical characteristic of the surface of the used material for conduits (on the contrary for pipes ε (p) can be measured or at least estimated accurately [32][33][34][35][36][37]).…”
Section: Of 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fuel cell was tested with three different cathode configurations [8]. As noted in [31], this roughness ε (FC) is not a real measurable physical characteristic of the surface of the used material for conduits (on the contrary for pipes ε (p) can be measured or at least estimated accurately [32][33][34][35][36][37]).…”
Section: Of 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standard curve can be constructed from a set of generic roughness function equations such as those given by Cebeci and Bradshaw ( 1977 ) as noted by Andersson et al. ( 2020 ). According to Hunsucker ( 2016 ), Ligrani and Moffat ( 1986 ) gives an expression for the Nikuradse-type roughness function which takes the form: where B N and B 1 are taken as ∼ 8.5 and 5.0 respectively, and where the value of G depends on the flow regime.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colebrook’s formula, most commonly used in the form of Equation 11 (Andersson et al. 2020 ), applies to all flow conditions: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations