Review and critique of the information systems development project failure literature: An argument for exploring information systems development project distress

Abstract

High failure rates of information systems development (ISD) projects continue to trouble organizations and information systems practices. Such a state of affairs has been of great concern for the information systems discipline for decades, motivating information systems researchers to focus on and extensively study ISD project failure. However, the increasing complexity and uncertainty of ISD projects and contemporary system development processes are challenging ISD project failure scholarship. In this article, we ask the questions: What are the contributions and weaknesses of the extant ISD project failure/success literature? What are potential avenues to move the ISD literature forward? To answer these questions, first, we present a literature review that assesses research contributions within the major perspectives on ISD failure (i.e. rationalist, process and narrative). While the extant research within all perspectives make significant contributions to knowledge, we find that researchers remain preoccupied with ‘project failure’ as an end state of an ISD project. They pay little attention to problematic situations arising during ISD projects before they become failed projects. Based on the review and critique of the literature, we then argue that there is a significant benefit in extending research focus from ISD project failure to ‘ISD project distress’, which we define as a harmful project condition involving dynamic and fluid constellation of critical problems that are difficult to identify, understand and resolve. While ISD project distress is an increasingly perilous and consequential phenomenon, little is known about its nature and potential responses. Drawing from the sensemaking literature, we propose a multilevel theoretical framework for understanding the nature and sources of ISD project distress that provides a foundation for exploring early detection and timely response. We demonstrate the theoretical and practical relevance of the concept of ISD project distress and propose a corresponding research agenda.

Appropriation of mHealth Interventions for Maternal Health Care in Sub-Saharan Africa: Hermeneutic Review

“…Integration is reached when using mHealth interventions becomes routine in the maternal client’s everyday life. The integration of the intervention in the clients’ lives was influenced by (1) attitudes and behaviors of the user and (2) performance of the technology [ 32 , 41 ]. At this stage, the use of the mHealth intervention influenced the maternal clients to attend all antenatal care clinics, take medication and have a balanced diet, deliver at the health facility, take the child to the clinic, and receive all the vaccines.…”

Early identification of distressed capital projects: a longitudinal approach

“…Some studies (e.g. Adebisi et al, 2020;Baghizadeh et al, 2020;Hanna and Gunduz, 2005) do investigate how project-management factors and issues influence the probability of project distress. For example, based on a systematic literature review, Mawutor (2014) notes that effective risk assessment and management in the project delivery process largely decreases the probability of a project becoming distressed.…”

“…Their test results show that factors such as inflation, quality of contract documents, quality requirements and economic stability are important determinants of risk levels associated with OCPs in the project delivery process. More recently, Baghizadeh et al (2020) further propose a theoretical framework for understanding the sources of project distress based on a systematic literature review.…”

The contract-type choice for short-term software development outsourcing: The role of behaviour-based formal control

“…However, the structure of the customised software industry is prone to holdups (Banerjee and Duflo, 2000). A literature review by Gupta et al (2019), with a focus on project management, confirms that the failure of projects in terms of conflicts during their execution regarding quality characteristics such as to scope, on time, to budget, ultimately leading to their premature termination, is still a very topical issue (see also Baghizadeh et al, 2020). We do not focus on project management but look at the contract between client and vendor.…”