2022
DOI: 10.3390/sym14122633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review and Evaluation of Belief Propagation Decoders for Polar Codes

Abstract: The polar code has become one of the most popular and important forward error correction (FEC) coding schemes due to its symmetric characteristics of channel polarization. This paper reviews various decoding schemes for polar codes and discusses their advantages and disadvantages. After reviewing the existing performance-enhancing techniques such as belief propagation decoding with list, a new method is proposed to further improve the performance. In addition, a new complexity reduction technique based on the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This channel type, characterized by only two closely located paths, results in a deep zero in the channel's frequency response, rendering the subchannels useless for transmission. However, if the channel estimation results closely resemble its original shape, the probability of successful error correction in the FEC (Forward Error Correction) decoder [23][24][25] is enhanced.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This channel type, characterized by only two closely located paths, results in a deep zero in the channel's frequency response, rendering the subchannels useless for transmission. However, if the channel estimation results closely resemble its original shape, the probability of successful error correction in the FEC (Forward Error Correction) decoder [23][24][25] is enhanced.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polar codes [1] achieve near-Shannon-limit performance while maintaining low encoding and decoding complexity, making them ideal for resource-constrained devices. However, their practical utility for short to moderate code lengths has been hampered [2] by the comparative inefficiency of the Successive Cancellation (SC) decoder. The Successive Cancellation List (SCL) decoder, introduced by Tal and Vardy [3], follows a similar path-wise traversal strategy as SC but maintains a list of up to L candidate paths for further exploration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%