Review and Exploration of China Subtropical Climate Change Research Based on Scientometric Analysis

Meng, Sun; Xiong, Deping

doi:10.1177/1940082918806795

Cited by 15 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…CiteSpace was a free Java-based application found by Chaomei Chen to analyze the potential knowledge contained in the scientific literature. It has been widely adopted for scientometric analysis in various scientific fields [ 29 ], and has achieved excellent results [ 30 , 31 ]. The parameters of CiteSpace for this study were set as follows: time slicing (1991–2018, 2003–2018, respectively), years per slice (1), term source (all selection), node type (author, institution, keyword, for Chinese and international data; country for international data), selection criteria (top 50), and visualization (cluster view-static, show merged network).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparative study of international and Chinese public health emergency management from the perspective of knowledge domains mapping

Zhu

Feng

et al. 2020

Environ Health Prev Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background At the end of 2019, the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severely damaged and endangered people’s lives. The public health emergency management system in China has played an essential role in handling the response to the outbreak, which has been appreciated by the World Health Organization and some countries. Hence, it is necessary to conduct an overall analysis of the development of the health emergency management system in China. This can provide a reference for scholars to aid in understanding the current situation and to reveal new research topics. Methods We collected 2247 international articles from the Web of Science database and 959 Chinese articles from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database. Bibliometric and mapping knowledge domain analysis methods were used in this study for temporal distribution analysis, cooperation network analysis, and co-word network analysis. Results The first international article in this field was published in 1991, while the first Chinese article was published in 2005. The research institutions producing these studies mainly existed in universities and health organizations. Developed countries and European countries published the most articles overall, while eastern China published the most articles within China. There were 52 burst words for international articles published from 1999–2018 and 18 burst words for Chinese articles published from 2003–2018. International top-ranked articles according to the number of citations appeared in 2005, 2007, 2009, 2014, 2015, and 2016, while the corresponding Chinese articles appeared in 2003, 2004, 2009, and 2011. Conclusions There are differences in the regional and economic distribution of international and Chinese cooperation networks. International research is often related to timely issues mainly by focusing on emergency preparedness and monitoring of public health events, while China has focused on public health emergencies and their disposition. International research began on terrorism and bioterrorism, followed by disaster planning and emergency preparedness, epidemics, and infectious diseases. China considered severe acute respiratory syndrome as the starting research background and the legal system construction as the research starting point, which was followed by the mechanism, structure, system, and training abroad for public health emergency management.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparative study of international and Chinese public health emergency management from the perspective of knowledge domains mapping

Zhu

Feng

et al. 2020

Environ Health Prev Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…R2 and Microsoft Excel 2010 for the data analysis. CiteSpace is a document visualization analysis software, which has been widely used in scientific meteorological analysis in various scientific fields [25][26][27]. CiteSpace 5.5.R2 has different parameter settings and options, resulting in differences in the result indicators [28,29].…”

Section: Data Analysis Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparative analysis on risk communication between international and Chinese literature from the perspective of knowledge domain visualization

Dong

Pang

et al. 2021

Environ Health Prev Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) severely damaged and endangered people’s lives at the end of 2019. Risk communication plays an important role in the response to it successfully, which has been appreciated by the World Health Organization. Therefore, a comprehensive analysis of risk communication research is necessary, which can understand current research hotspots and reveal new trends. Methods In this study, we collected 1134 international articles from the Web of Science database and 3983 Chinese articles from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database. Bibliometric and mapping knowledge domain analysis methods were used for temporal distribution analysis, cooperation network analysis, co-word network analysis, and burst detection analysis. Results The first article in this field was published by western scholars earlier, while the first Chinese article in 2002. Research institutions mainly come from universities. The USA plays a key role in this field. Chinese scholars had a closer cooperation network, but there was less cooperation among domestic institutions. Risk perception, trust, risk management, and risk information had always been the research hotspots in this academic. Trust, sentiment research, and public risk events were essential directions for the future. There are 25 burst words for international articles, while 11 burst words for Chinese articles from 2000 to 2020. Conclusions In summary, both domestic and international researchers are concerned about risk communication, risk perception, trust, and risk information. International research on risk communication is systematic and comprehensive relatively. However, Chinese scholars take severe acute respiratory syndrome as the research background and reviewing foreign knowledge as the research starting point. With the purpose of practical and applied research based on a public emergency, the risk communication research lacks continuity in Chinese academy in the past years.

show abstract

“…R2 and Microsoft Excel 2010. Citespace is a document visualization analysis software, which has been widely used in scienti c meteorological analysis in various scienti c elds [22][23][24]. This research mainly used 5.5.R2 software for biometric analysis.…”

Section: Data Analysis Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Analysis on Risk Communication between International and Chinese Literature from the Perspective of Knowledge Domains Visualization

Dong

Pang

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background At the end of 2019, the outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) severely damaged and endangered people’s lives. Risk communication plays an important role in the response to COVID-19 successfully. Therefore, a comprehensive analysis of risk communication research is necessary, which can understand current research hotspots and reveal new trends.Methods In this study, international articles come from Web of science database (3983), Chinese articles come from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database (1134), Bibliometric and mapping knowledge domain analysis were used for cooperation network, co-word co-occurrence network and burst detection analysis.Results The first article in this field was published by western scholars earlier, while the first Chinese article in 2002. Research institutions mainly come from universities. The United States play a key role in this field. Chinese scholars had a closer cooperation network, but there was less cooperation among domestic institutions. Risk perception, public trust, risk management, and risk information dissemination had always been the research hot-spots in this academic direction. Trust, sentiment research, and public risk events were essential directions for future. There are 25 burst words for international articles, while 11 burst words for Chinese articles from 2000–2020.Conclusions In summary, both domestic and international researchers are concerned about risk communication, risk perception, trust, and risk information. International scholars begin to take cares with ecological and technological risks research, radiating many areas of social risk. Compared with international research on risk communication more systematic and comprehensive, Chinese scholars takes SARS as the research background and reviewing foreign knowledge as the research starting point. With purpose of practical and applied research based on a public emergency, the risk-communication research lacks continuity in Chinese academy in the past years.

show abstract

Review and Exploration of China Subtropical Climate Change Research Based on Scientometric Analysis

Cited by 15 publications

References 59 publications

A comparative study of international and Chinese public health emergency management from the perspective of knowledge domains mapping

A comparative study of international and Chinese public health emergency management from the perspective of knowledge domains mapping

A comparative analysis on risk communication between international and Chinese literature from the perspective of knowledge domain visualization

A Comparative Analysis on Risk Communication between International and Chinese Literature from the Perspective of Knowledge Domains Visualization

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About