2021
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-21-1297-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review article: Observations for high-impact weather and their use in verification

Abstract: Abstract. Verification of forecasts and warnings of high-impact weather is needed by the meteorological centres, but how to perform it still presents many open questions, starting from which data are suitable as reference. This paper reviews new observations which can be considered for the verification of high-impact weather and provides advice for their usage in objective verification. Two high-impact weather phenomena are considered: thunderstorm and fog. First, a framework for the verification of high-impac… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to further stress that point, this subsection focuses on two selected case studies (12 April 2004 and 19 May 2018), both ascribed to the intense rainfall cluster for MAM. These days were chosen because they correspond to high‐impact weather events (e.g., Marsigli et al, 2021), which were identified as primarily important by the World Meteorological Organization due to their increasing intensity and frequency under climate change. In order to quantify to which extent they differ from the average atmospheric circulation anomalies associated with intense rainfall days in MAM, Figure S5 shows the distance between the anomalous atmospheric pattern of each day and the MAM cluster centroid for the 700 and 200 hPa fields, on the x‐axis and y‐axis, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to further stress that point, this subsection focuses on two selected case studies (12 April 2004 and 19 May 2018), both ascribed to the intense rainfall cluster for MAM. These days were chosen because they correspond to high‐impact weather events (e.g., Marsigli et al, 2021), which were identified as primarily important by the World Meteorological Organization due to their increasing intensity and frequency under climate change. In order to quantify to which extent they differ from the average atmospheric circulation anomalies associated with intense rainfall days in MAM, Figure S5 shows the distance between the anomalous atmospheric pattern of each day and the MAM cluster centroid for the 700 and 200 hPa fields, on the x‐axis and y‐axis, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, these mismatches fall into the double‐penalty class of occurrences, for which it is challenging to match the observations with absolute precision. The cause is the intrinsic chaotic behaviour controlling deep moist convection, which is responsible for the low predictability of the exact localization of the associated convective processes, justifying the use of fuzzy verification techniques for quantifying the performance of their simulations (Marsigli et al ., 2021). This issue could be relevant in downstream modelling applications that require high spatial precision, such as in hydrological modelling (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But notably in severe weather, human-made forecasts were described to have a better sense of the weather situation. While benefits and flaws of meteorological models are widely discussed in meteorology (see Marsigli et al, 2021; Murphy, 1993), the role of forecasters (especially, forecasters’ bodies) has not been subject to increased scrutiny by social or cultural studies. Only two studies by sociologists Fine (2007) and Daipha (2015b) conceptualise meteorologists’ working practices ethnographically.…”
Section: Ethnographies Of Weather-sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%