Review Article: Politics, Urbanism, and Archaeology in "Roma Capitale": A Troubled Past and a Controversial Future

Packer, James E.; Barroero, Liliana; Conti, Andrea A.; Racheli, Alberto Maria; Serio, Marco; Insolera, Italo; Perego, Franco; Benevolo, Leonardo; Manacorda, Daniele; Tamassia, R.; Jonsson, Max

doi:10.2307/505403

Cited by 19 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…10 However, with the advent of the second world war and, later, the prolonged reluctance by Italian scholars to study an ancient monument allied so closely with fascism, progress on understanding the design of the Basilica Ulpia and the structuring of its interior stalled. 11 Eventually, the material collected during the excavations of 1928-34 provided a basis for the reconstruction of the basilica proposed by Carla Amici in 1982. Her reconstruction accorded generally with those proposed by her predecessors, but differed by postulating an inner and outer colonnade at the upper level plus an exterior terrace, and the inner colonnade of the upper level was again topped by a clerestory (Fig.…”

Section: Rediscovery and Modern Reconstructionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Basilica Ulpia, Early Christian Churches and the Roman Double Truss

Robison¹

2021

Archit. hist.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The most prominent and long-lasting of the timber truss-roofed buildings from imperial Roman times was the Basilica Ulpia, the interior of which has been reconstructed by recent writers but with little agreement regarding the upper sections. The reconstruction that best passes the test of engineering viability is shown here to be the one published by James E. Packer in 1997, but Packer’s reconstruction is unconvincing with regard to the roof. The argument advanced now is that the roof was constructed with double trusses of the kind once found in the early Christian basilicas of Old St Peter’s and San Paolo fuori le Mura, and then recorded in the eighteenth century by Jean-Baptiste Rondelet, which were very similar in size to those used for the Basilica Ulpia. The spacing of roof trusses was determined by the nave column spacing. Engineering analysis determines that the trusses had sufficient capacity to support the roof and that the double-truss arrangement was critical to avoid overloading the stone architraves. The article speculates that doubling the Roman truss may have been a previous innovation. It argues that the later early Christian basilicas relied on the Roman double truss because of its proven performance, and that this continuity was recognised by Auguste Choisy and others who considered their use to be a reflection of earlier Roman practice.

show abstract

Section: Rediscovery and Modern Reconstructionsmentioning

confidence: 99%