1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf01806690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review: Biologic heterogeneity of cancer metastases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that these drugs are highly active in vitro. Reported clinical response rates for these drugs compared to 5-FU, ADR and cyclophospha mide support these findings [18,22,27,28], In general tumor response to chemotherapeutic agents is character ized by its heterogeneity [1]. All cell lines responded in a different dose-related manner.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates that these drugs are highly active in vitro. Reported clinical response rates for these drugs compared to 5-FU, ADR and cyclophospha mide support these findings [18,22,27,28], In general tumor response to chemotherapeutic agents is character ized by its heterogeneity [1]. All cell lines responded in a different dose-related manner.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…However, patients with the same tumor pathology may not respond to the same drug treatment. Tumor heterogeneity is well known in breast cancer [1], Drugs can then be tested in several assays to obtain chemosensitivity profiles [2], The ATP cell viabili ty assay (ATP-CVA) is a relatively new system to assess chemosensitivity by measuring total cell kill [3][4][5][6][7], This test has been adopted for chemosensitivity testing of human gynecologic malignancies, with promising prelim inary results with regard to clinical correlation between in vitro sensitivity and in vivo results. Further, the results of ATP-CVA compare very well with those of other chemo sensitivity assays, especially the clonogenic assay and thy midine uptake methods [3-5, 7, 8], In contrast, the ATP-CVA does not rely only on assessment of S-phase cells (thymidine uptake) or the ability of tumor cells to prolifer ate (clonogenic assay) but on total cell kill.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(13) Therefore, we stress the importance of identifying organ-specific characteristics of metastatic breast cancer, because such data can further the understanding of the natural history of the disease. (5,14) The objective of this study was to identify the clinical and pathological factors that affect the survival of patients with a history of breast 489 pleural effusion, the mean age at death was 57.8 ± 12.0 years. Therefore, the mean time from the diagnosis of the primary tumor to the identification of malignant pleural effusion was 20 months, and the mean survival after the identification of malignant pleural effusion was 6 months.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, experimental and some clinical data suggest that 1) the primary tumor is genetically heterogeneous, 2) the clones responsible for organ dissemination may not even be present in the primary tumor but develop through sequential genetic alterations, and 3) they compose a very small percentage of the primary tumor. 11 Earlier studies exclusively used HercepTest to assess the maintenance of HER-2/neu genotype in metastatic lesions and found it concordant in case of lymph node, liver and lung metastases. [12][13][14][15][16] Recent reports provided evidence that the HER-2/neu genotype of BRC may change in the metastases: loss of HER-2/neu expression was reported in one case in pleural metastases, 17 while loss of HER-2/neu amplification was found in 21%, but appearance of HER-2/neu amplification was even more frequent in visceral metastases (30%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%