2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review: Evaluation of bull fertility. Functional and molecular approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation of male fertility and the effectiveness of various assisted reproductive procedures, including sperm processing, in vitro embryo production and artificial insemination, depend heavily on the precise characterization of sperm quality (Bollwein & Malama, 2023). The current results revealed that spermatozoa motility, count, viability and normal morphology were elevated in the high-fertile group compared to the lower one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The evaluation of male fertility and the effectiveness of various assisted reproductive procedures, including sperm processing, in vitro embryo production and artificial insemination, depend heavily on the precise characterization of sperm quality (Bollwein & Malama, 2023). The current results revealed that spermatozoa motility, count, viability and normal morphology were elevated in the high-fertile group compared to the lower one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Moreover, in the study of Rajamanickam et al (2017b) the HF bulls had increased tyrosine phosphorylation than LF bulls. Since regulation of Na/K-ATPase activity is observed during capacitation (Jimenez et al, 2012), and it was observed that capacitation increased Na/K-ATPase content and activity in bull sperm, apparently through mitochondrial translation (Rajamanickam et al, 2017a); further than differences between measurement technique, species, microenvironment, and reproductive strategies adopted that influence bull fertility (Bollwein and Malama, 2023;Kathiravan et al, 2011;Harstine et al, 2018), it is plausible that sperm pre-selection using percoll and assessment of sperm traits in a specific subpopulation (membrane-intact sperm) explain the differences between the report of Rajamanickam et al (2017b) and the present data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a relationship between membrane integrity and fertility is commonly reported (Christensen et al, 2011;Kumaresan et al, 2017). Those discrepancies highlight the importance of associating several sperm traits to better predict a sire's fertility (Kumaresan et al, 2017;Bollwein and Malama, 2023;Muhammad Aslam et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%