1976
DOI: 10.1093/fs/30.1.73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review. Les Masques mortuaires de Napoleon. Veauce, E. de

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In his 1964 article [2], de Veauce wrote "André Masséna, son of Victor Masséna, declared that this mask was not in the collections of his father". In his second book [3], in 1971, de Veauce indicated that Louis-Charles de Bourbon was in fact "a swindler whose true name was William Reeves". Consequently, de Veauce alerted at that time the Pr Félix Markham (an eminent specialist of the Napoléon period) and the mask was declared as a false and remote from the window where it was laced in the London Museum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his 1964 article [2], de Veauce wrote "André Masséna, son of Victor Masséna, declared that this mask was not in the collections of his father". In his second book [3], in 1971, de Veauce indicated that Louis-Charles de Bourbon was in fact "a swindler whose true name was William Reeves". Consequently, de Veauce alerted at that time the Pr Félix Markham (an eminent specialist of the Napoléon period) and the mask was declared as a false and remote from the window where it was laced in the London Museum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%