2019
DOI: 10.1109/rbme.2018.2876450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of 2-D/3-D Reconstruction Using Statistical Shape and Intensity Models and X-Ray Image Synthesis: Toward a Unified Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To quantify the accuracy of our shape model, we calculated the following metrics, as suggested by Ref. 26 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify the accuracy of our shape model, we calculated the following metrics, as suggested by Ref. 26 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One application for SSAMs is generative models where new specimens are sampled based on a training population. One sub-type of this class of application is 2D-to-3D reconstruction where the 3D shape and often internal architecture of a bone is reconstructed based on one or a few 2D radiographs or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images (see Reyneke et al [60] for a dedicated methodological review). In these approaches, the 3D SSAM is sampled and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR); i.e., projections of the SSAM are generated.…”
Section: Shape Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It maybe of interest to compute 2D objects from our 3D models in order to for example, analyse 2D images such as X-ray [29], [30]. This can be achieved in our modelling approach through a transformation that maps a 3D model instance into the 2D image space.…”
Section: D Projection From 3d Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%