2020
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Audiovestibular Symptoms Following Exposure to Acoustic and Electromagnetic Energy Outside Conventional Human Hearing

Abstract: Objective: We aim to examine the existing literature on, and identify knowledge gaps in, the study of adverse animal and human audiovestibular effects from exposure to acoustic or electromagnetic waves that are outside of conventional human hearing. Design/Setting/Participants: A review was performed, which included searches of relevant MeSH terms using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Primary outcomes included documented auditory and/or vestibular signs or symptoms in animals or humans exposed to infrasound, ultra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Active solutions could have negative consequences or long-term health effects, which physicians have not yet directly investigated. Some studies suggest the need for extensive research on standard technology used in wearables, such as radiation sources/waves around the body (e.g., WiFi and ultrasound) [46,47,48,49,50]. While it may seem overly cautious or unrealistic at this stage of wearable technology, we want to maintain our effort to reduce the exposure of our volunteers and ourselves to signals that have not yet proven to be risk-free.…”
Section: Facial Monitoring With Wearablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active solutions could have negative consequences or long-term health effects, which physicians have not yet directly investigated. Some studies suggest the need for extensive research on standard technology used in wearables, such as radiation sources/waves around the body (e.g., WiFi and ultrasound) [46,47,48,49,50]. While it may seem overly cautious or unrealistic at this stage of wearable technology, we want to maintain our effort to reduce the exposure of our volunteers and ourselves to signals that have not yet proven to be risk-free.…”
Section: Facial Monitoring With Wearablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“Cavitation noise” refers to a series of reactions that lead to bubble growth, oscillation, and rupture when ultrasonic waves propagate through a medium. When the cavitation bubble bursts, the energy stored inside is released, and noise is generated [ 124 ]. Workers who have worked in ultrasound for a long time may develop a disturbance of the auditory nerve and characterize a range of symptoms, including headache, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and temporary tinnitus, known as “ultrasound disease.” Iversen believes that ultrasound-induced hearing loss is due to the activation of the vestibular otolithic organs by acoustic radiation forces [ 125 ].…”
Section: Shortcomings and Perspectives Of Ultrasound Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin ( 3 ) suggested a “tissue-injuring level” of 20 Pa for intracranial pressures based on a conventionally accepted threshold of 120 dB re 20 μPa for noise-induced hearing loss due to damage to hair cells in the cochlea. Lubner et al described a variety of audiovestibular symptoms from ultrasound exposures above 20 kHz, for example “complaints of fatigue, buzzing, nausea, and headaches” in workers from an ultrasonic cleaning bath (115 dB at 40 kHz), with “mixed conclusions” about permanent audiovestibular damage from ultrasound exposures ( 10 ). Peak acoustic pressures shown in Table 1 far exceed these levels, but differences in exposures are considerable.…”
Section: Thresholds For Perception and Adverse Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%