2023
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Cardiovascular Risk of Androgen Deprivation Therapy and the Influence of Race in Men with Prostate Cancer

Abstract: Androgen deprivation therapy is the cornerstone of prostate cancer therapy. Recent studies have revealed an association between androgen deprivation therapy and cardiovascular adverse effects such as myocardial infarction and stroke. This review summarizes the available research on the cardiovascular risk of men using androgen deprivation therapy. We also discuss racial disparities surrounding both prostate cancer and cardiovascular disease, emphasizing the importance of biological/molecular and socioeconomic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 78 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prostate cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality, and its treatment often involves ADT such as AA and ENZ [3]. While these therapies have proven effective in managing mCRPC [3,28] they come with a risk of adverse cardiovascular events [14,28,29]. Furthermore, the available literature on the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with AA and ENZ predominantly comprises clinical trials, with a limited representation of real-world data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prostate cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality, and its treatment often involves ADT such as AA and ENZ [3]. While these therapies have proven effective in managing mCRPC [3,28] they come with a risk of adverse cardiovascular events [14,28,29]. Furthermore, the available literature on the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with AA and ENZ predominantly comprises clinical trials, with a limited representation of real-world data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%