2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of combined approaches and multi-criteria analysis for corporate environmental evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
54
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These strategies are being applied both to the production side and to transportation, which is responsible for a quarter of all CO 2 emissions (Grant et al, 2009). The main methodology employed to evaluate environmental impacts has been the analysis of "eco-balance", based on a collection of indicators of sustainability and environmental impacts using solid theoretical reasoning (Herva and Roca, 2013). This technique has proved effective in guiding decision-making processes and for establishing a practical evaluation framework for monitoring (Cerutti et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These strategies are being applied both to the production side and to transportation, which is responsible for a quarter of all CO 2 emissions (Grant et al, 2009). The main methodology employed to evaluate environmental impacts has been the analysis of "eco-balance", based on a collection of indicators of sustainability and environmental impacts using solid theoretical reasoning (Herva and Roca, 2013). This technique has proved effective in guiding decision-making processes and for establishing a practical evaluation framework for monitoring (Cerutti et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, some writers maintain that it is only in agricultural systems that are sustainable over the long term that the output of all of the components in the system is capable of balancing the input (Lal, 2008). This view of sustainable agriculture, although accepted by the majority of researchers and technicians working in the field, is vague with regard to the actual methods for achieving sustainability (Lichtfouse et al, 2009;Herva and Roca, 2013). In the context of fruit production, there are various sets of guidelines ranging from those that attempt to optimise profitability (conventional production) to those that respect certain norms relative to sustainability (organic production) or that lead to intermediate systems, such as integrated production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some approaches are based on traditional methods like Multi-Attribute Analysis technique (MAA) (see e.g., [12]), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) (see e.g., [10,36]), Analytical Network Process (ANP) (see [1,11]) and others specifically developed models (see e.g., [22]). Several references to diverse applications of multi-criteria analysis can be foun to specific issues in corporate environmental evaluation in [15].…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several applications of the AHP have emerged in current literature across various disciplines. For the current developments, theoretical extensions, and applications of the AHP, see the reviews of Vaidya and Kumar (2006), Ho (2008), Sipahi and Timor (2010), Ishizaka andLabib (2011), Subramanian andRamanathan (2012), Herva and Roca (2013). The contribution of this work lies in identifying general appropriate criteria for each level of an organization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%