1998
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

REVIEW OF COMMUNITY-BASED RESEARCH: Assessing Partnership Approaches to Improve Public Health

Abstract: Community-based research in public health focuses on social, structural, and physical environmental inequities through active involvement of community members, organizational representatives, and researchers in all aspects of the research process. Partners contribute their expertise to enhance understanding of a given phenomenon and to integrate the knowledge gained with action to benefit the community involved. This review provides a synthesis of key principles of community-based research, examines its place … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

40
4,458
0
68

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,683 publications
(4,566 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
40
4,458
0
68
Order By: Relevance
“…Concomitantly, negative experiences might have a negative influence on future propensity for PPE, although the health professionals interviewed did not mention extracting lessons from these negative experiences. This result is complementary with action-research, which shows that negative experiences with action research impedes the next research process for both researchers and community members (Israel, Schulz, Parker, & Becker, 1998;Sullivan et al, 2001aSullivan et al, , 2001b. So it is important that participants in PPE have positive experiences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Concomitantly, negative experiences might have a negative influence on future propensity for PPE, although the health professionals interviewed did not mention extracting lessons from these negative experiences. This result is complementary with action-research, which shows that negative experiences with action research impedes the next research process for both researchers and community members (Israel, Schulz, Parker, & Becker, 1998;Sullivan et al, 2001aSullivan et al, , 2001b. So it is important that participants in PPE have positive experiences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The collaborative work crosses several disciplines and the interdisciplinary research team facilitates better methodological processes addressing the challenges related to community-based research [13]. The co-location of the project with numerous other research projects (eg wildlife and fish contaminant monitoring) is directly supporting our efforts to understand pathways of contaminants exposure, and how social change, climate change, harvest levels and resource development may affect contaminants exposure in the future.…”
Section: Collaborative Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A community-based approach is dependant on the engagement of the community, and defined as those who are affected by the health issue, and also every group with a specific culture that can take the lead in engagement efforts and engage in joint action in a geographical location [11–13]. Community-based projects in the NTs usually focus on environmental monitoring (eg wildlife, contaminants, climate change) or Traditional Knowledge (TK) preservation [1420].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23 In order to obtain community perspective, 41 focus groups of healthcare providers, community organization representatives, as well as potential NCS participants (expectant mothers, teenage mothers, couples trying to conceive) were convened from varying communities across the U.S. Multiple focus groups were conducted in locations representing all 9 of the U.S. regions including: Los Angeles, CA; Bellevue, WA; Sioux Falls, SD; Kansas City, MO; Chicago, IL; Burlington, VT; New York, NY; Philadelphia, PA; Research Triangle Park, NC; Farmer's Branch, TX; Albuquerque, NM.…”
Section: Phase I-planning (October 2000-october 2005)mentioning
confidence: 99%