2019
DOI: 10.35840/2631-5068/6523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Core Power Loss Analysis Using Finite Element Methods

Abstract: There are two principal methods are utilized to estimate the core power loss (CPL) in magnetic components: Empirical equations and hysteresis models. Both approaches need an anterior test or analysis to calculate the CPL. Most of them are based on improved Steinmetz equations. Tests are usually costly or the number of necessary tests is excessive for the component design development. 2D analyses using Finite Element are not good enough for several magnetic components for their lack of symmetries.Non-symmetric … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it generally requires a large number of finite-element analyses for fitness evaluation, and thus it leads to a high computational cost to search for the optimal solution. To solve this problem, an artificial neural network (ANN) has been used as the surrogate model, which works much faster than FEM in some previous works [2]- [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it generally requires a large number of finite-element analyses for fitness evaluation, and thus it leads to a high computational cost to search for the optimal solution. To solve this problem, an artificial neural network (ANN) has been used as the surrogate model, which works much faster than FEM in some previous works [2]- [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%