2019
DOI: 10.2172/1782069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Experimental Assay Data for PWR Spent Fuel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data in the SFCOMPO database have been independently reviewed for consistency with the original reports but have not been formally evaluated using a standard evaluation format. Previous data evaluations have been performed as part of depletion code validations, with emphasis on validation data for burnup credit criticality safety [e.g., 7,8,9,10,11]. An effort of the SFCOMPO TRG is underway to publish the first evaluations for individual assay data using a standard data evaluation format [12].…”
Section: Experimental Assay Data For Spent Nuclear Fuelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data in the SFCOMPO database have been independently reviewed for consistency with the original reports but have not been formally evaluated using a standard evaluation format. Previous data evaluations have been performed as part of depletion code validations, with emphasis on validation data for burnup credit criticality safety [e.g., 7,8,9,10,11]. An effort of the SFCOMPO TRG is underway to publish the first evaluations for individual assay data using a standard data evaluation format [12].…”
Section: Experimental Assay Data For Spent Nuclear Fuelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous review of existing experimental radiochemical assay (RCA) data for pressurized water reactor (PWR) spent nuclear fuel (SNF) identified gaps in existing experimental data and assessed the value of new measurements to fill such gaps for nuclides relevant to burnup credit, shielding, and decay heat validation [1]. This review emphasized the need for new experimental data to fill in the gaps at high burnups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%