2017
DOI: 10.1891/1052-3073.28.2.253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Family Financial Decision Making: Suggestions for Future Research and Implications for Financial Education

Abstract: This article reviews the theories and literature in intrahousehold financial decisions, spousal partners and financial decision making, family system and financial decision process, children, and financial decisions. The article draws conclusions from the literature review and discusses directions for future research and educational programs. Most financial education and counseling takes place at the individual level, whereas financial decisions take place at household and intrahousehold levels. Family members… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When the wife is employed and contributes an income comparable to the husband's, new role structures emerge within the family that usually involve wife having more power and influence in the family's major economic decision-making (Juyal and Singh, 2009). Women's involvement in household financial decisions increases with their share of household income and their formal financial education, and decreases with their spouses' share of income and formal financial education (Bernasek and Bajtelsmit, 2002), (Kim, Gutter and Spangler, 2017), (Winkler, 1998), (Yusof, 2015). Women's involvement also decreases with the wealth of the household (Bernasek and Bajtelsmit, 2002).…”
Section: Incomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the wife is employed and contributes an income comparable to the husband's, new role structures emerge within the family that usually involve wife having more power and influence in the family's major economic decision-making (Juyal and Singh, 2009). Women's involvement in household financial decisions increases with their share of household income and their formal financial education, and decreases with their spouses' share of income and formal financial education (Bernasek and Bajtelsmit, 2002), (Kim, Gutter and Spangler, 2017), (Winkler, 1998), (Yusof, 2015). Women's involvement also decreases with the wealth of the household (Bernasek and Bajtelsmit, 2002).…”
Section: Incomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As illustrated in Figure 1, we refer to this as a “joint choosers” joint consumption type, which maps onto another example of decision making in Gorlin and Dhar’s (2012)’s framework in which two consumers make a decision for joint consumption (e.g., two consumers jointly deciding on a restaurant to eat at together). Early research in this line typically considered married couples making joint decisions such as choosing a home to purchase or other major financial decisions, examining the differential roles of husbands and wives (Davis 1976; Davis 1970; Filiatrault and Ritchie 1980; see also more recently, Kim, Gutter, and Spangler 2017) or how couples balance conflicting preferences over time (Corfman and Lehmann 1987). More recent research typically has two decision makers brought into the laboratory as a preexisting dyad or matched by researchers to form a dyad and compares the choices made by different compositions of dyads or by dyads versus single consumers (Dzhogleva and Lamberton 2014; Nikolova and Lamberton 2016).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the first example involving brunch, Consumer A is the “requestor” and Consumer B is the “responder.” In the second example involving movies, Consumer B, who asks about Consumer A’s movie consumption preferences, is the “requestor” and Consumer A is the “responder.” Note that our framework defines the “requestor” and “responder” roles in terms of who solicits versus expresses joint consumption preferences, not who initiates the joint consumption get-together in the first place. Note also that a given consumer may be a requestor in some situations and a responder in other situations; these roles are not fixed ones in which one consumer has much more domain expertise than the other (such as in the case of household financial management; Kim, Gutter, and Spangler 2017; Ward and Lynch 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to previous studies, personal finance decision is strongly determined by several aspects, for instance financial literacy, perceived risk, lifestyle, and social factors (Putri & Lestari, 2019;Kim & et.al., 2017;Mohiuddin, 2018;Lestari, 2019;Hong & Yi, 2012). This paper attempt to examine (Putri & Lestari, 2019); Kim & et.al. (2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%