Review of Financing Options for Highways and Transit

Johnson, Gary T.; Hoel, L A

doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(1987)113:1(72)

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The financing burden of transit systems constitutes another impediment factor. Financing options for transit systems include charges on benefiting properties, joint ventures with the private sector, and marketing and merchandising approaches (Johnson and Hoel 1987;ITE Technical Committee 6Y-33 1988). The extent to which transit system financing constitutes an impediment is related to the differential possibilities offered by various transit system technologies with respect to financing techniques falling within each of the above categories of options.…”

Section: Impediment Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2001

JPT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Impediment Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2001

JPT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Issues in financing urban rail transit projects and value captures

Hayashi

1989

Transportation Research Part A: General

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Development of institutional funding model of deep discount bond and land lease on a toll road project

Dwirahman

Latief²,

Rarasati³

2018

MATEC Web of Conferences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Toll road is one of the most important parts of connectivity infrastructure. However, the current length of the existing toll roads is still not sufficient compared to the increasing number of vehicles in Indonesia. Nevertheless, the needs for infrastructure funding including for toll roads are not comparable to the availability of state budget. Innovations in funding schemes were required to meet such needs such as Deep Discount Bond (DDB) and Land Lease (LL). To ensure these schemes are running appropriately, an institutional funding model is needed to organize the stakeholders involved. Therefore, five institutional funding models were developed based on the conditions of the DDB issuer (project or corporate finance), LL executor [State Assets Management Institutions (LMAN) or Special Purpose Company (SPC)], and the number of SPC in the models. In addition, ten institutional success factors were identified. Data was collected using in-depth interviews consisting of three parts and analyzed using the Relative Importance Index to rank the institutional success factors found and using the Multi Criteria Analysis to choose the most effective institutional funding model. The institutional success factors that were found to have great values were those related to Government. At the same time, the most effective funding model is a corporate finance scheme, where LL is executed by LMAN, and a single SPC is used.

show abstract

Review of Financing Options for Highways and Transit

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Untitled

Untitled

Issues in financing urban rail transit projects and value captures

Development of institutional funding model of deep discount bond and land lease on a toll road project

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About