2011
DOI: 10.1186/1749-799x-6-36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of fixation techniques for the four-part fractured proximal humerus in hemiarthroplasty

Abstract: IntroductionThe clinical outcome of hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures is not satisfactory. Secondary fragment dislocation may prevent bone integration; the primary stability by a fixation technique is therefore needed to accomplish tuberosity healing. Present technical comparison of surgical fixation techniques reveals the state-of-the-art approach and highlights promising techniques for enhanced stability.MethodA classification of available fixation techniques for three- and four part fractures … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge all the technical and clinical papers reporting on the use of a HA in the treatment of PHF and all the company surgical technique manuals illustrate routinely a separation between the tuberosities before implanting the prosthesis and subsequently reconstruct the separated tuberosities around the prosthesis. [ 9 , 17 , 36 , 37 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge all the technical and clinical papers reporting on the use of a HA in the treatment of PHF and all the company surgical technique manuals illustrate routinely a separation between the tuberosities before implanting the prosthesis and subsequently reconstruct the separated tuberosities around the prosthesis. [ 9 , 17 , 36 , 37 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the design of the prosthesis and cementation, this difference in healing rates of the greater tuberosity may be attributed to different fixation techniques. Recent methods to enhance tuberosity healing include suture techniques (53)(54)(55)(56) and bone grafting (17,57,58). Although there is no consensus on the suture fixation of greater tuberosity, the main fixation method is the combination of vertical fixation and horizontal fixation with/without cerclage fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alcuni di essi presentano superfici atte a favorire l'adesione dei frammenti tuberositari alla protesi, altri sono caratterizzati da corpi di piccole dimensioni e/o cavi per agevolare l'applicazione di innesti ossei e la consolidazione prossimale, altre ancora hanno numerosi fori prossimali o colletti traforati per consentire il passaggio dei fili di sutura e ottimizzare la fissazione periprotesica del complesso tuberosità-cuffia (Fig. 3) [21]. La più importante evoluzione di queste protesi è tuttavia consistita nello sviluppo di sistemi modulari a piattaforma, dove la componente omerale anatomica consta di tre parti fondamentali: stelo, corpo e testa (Fig.…”
Section: Protesi Parziale Anatomicaunclassified