2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2018.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of heavy charged particle transport in MCNP6.2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the three codes do not agree for primary alpha emitted below 7 MeV. The main contributor to these discrepancies could be the stopping power for charged particles that can vary consequently from the different calculation codes as detailed in articles from the literature [27,28]. The new values can be used to predict doses from skin contamination for known activities of radionuclide of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the three codes do not agree for primary alpha emitted below 7 MeV. The main contributor to these discrepancies could be the stopping power for charged particles that can vary consequently from the different calculation codes as detailed in articles from the literature [27,28]. The new values can be used to predict doses from skin contamination for known activities of radionuclide of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simulations of alpha primary particles with GEANT4 and FLUKA, the standard physics model is considered. For MCNP [27], the Vavilov model is used. Tests are performed with MCNP turning off the Vavilov model and using instead the Continuous Slowing Down Approximation and with FLUKA turning on the IONFLUCT to activate ionization fluctuations.…”
Section: Particularity Of Alpha Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCNP6 is designed to track many particle types: not only N particles, but also charged particles including electrons, protons, and heavy ions over broad energy ranges. [24] In the ray-tracing method, the physical interactions between particles and the atoms of the target material are listed in a table. The energy (∆E i ) deposited in each voxel (i) of the digital model of the human body was recorded using…”
Section: Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For aircraft altitude neutron sources, the study used the neutron spectrum measured at 200 g/cm 2 atmospheric depth (altitude 11.9 km) by Hess et al, as shown in Figure 6. For the proton source, the spectrum obtained through Roesler et al's FLUKA simulation at a 200 g/cm 2 atmospheric depth was used, as shown in Figure 6 (200 g/cm 2 corresponds to an altitude of 11.9 km) (Roesler et al, 1998;Zieb et al, 2018). The particle histories used were 10 9 for neutrons and 10 8 for protons.…”
Section: Weight (Kg/m 2 )mentioning
confidence: 99%