2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of large vision models and visual prompt engineering

Jiaqi Wang,
Zhengliang Liu,
Lin Zhao
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it was observed that ChatGPT 3.5 did not change its answers according to the question, could not determine the upper and lower limits in a question involving inequality, and made a mistake in converting a verbal expression into an algebraic expression in another question. This is in line with the findings of another study that some of the participants had concerns about the accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT as it may provide incorrect or incomplete solutions to mathematical problems (Wu & Yu, 2023). Another study revealed that the majority of participants affirmed ChatGPT's commitment to providing precise and beneficial responses to users' enquiries.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, it was observed that ChatGPT 3.5 did not change its answers according to the question, could not determine the upper and lower limits in a question involving inequality, and made a mistake in converting a verbal expression into an algebraic expression in another question. This is in line with the findings of another study that some of the participants had concerns about the accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT as it may provide incorrect or incomplete solutions to mathematical problems (Wu & Yu, 2023). Another study revealed that the majority of participants affirmed ChatGPT's commitment to providing precise and beneficial responses to users' enquiries.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Also, it is important to note that prompt engineering is crucial in enabling ChatGPT to display its full potential. To do so, an open and purposeful dialogue is required with human guidance, as the system's abilities can be enhanced when provided with appropriate clues (Bozkurt et al, 2023;Short et al, 2023;Wang et al, 2023). As a matter of fact, in recent years, it is known that ChatGPT is able to interpret and contextualize the prompt when formulating a structured review question, creating relevance criteria and scanning the topics according to the level of relevance (Qureshi et al, 2023).…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the segmentation of dyed chickens consistently exhibited superior performance across all algorithms when compared to undyed chickens. This can be attributed to the distinct colors of the dyed chickens, which provide a more discernible feature for the model to track, thereby reducing identity switches and enhancing tracking accuracy [ 32 ]. This nuanced capability of TAM to adeptly manage variations in object features further solidifies its position as a versatile and reliable model for chicken tracking applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prompt engineering focuses on the skill of designing and creating effective prompts that guide ChatGPT to produce the best possible output for your task. We followed existing literature [ 8 - 11 ] combined with our expertise and experimentation to provide a framework that yields the best result when developing a digital solution like PAMS ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%