2024
DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.29.2.020901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of machine learning for optical imaging of burn wound severity assessment

Robert H. Wilson,
Rebecca Rowland,
Gordon T. Kennedy
et al.

Abstract: Over the past decade, machine learning (ML) algorithms have rapidly become much more widespread for numerous biomedical applications, including the diagnosis and categorization of disease and injury.Aim: Here, we seek to characterize the recent growth of ML techniques that use imaging data to classify burn wound severity and report on the accuracies of different approaches.Approach: To this end, we present a comprehensive literature review of preclinical and clinical studies using ML techniques to classify the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 83 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This OCT burn depth score complements other widely used scores to help us as clinicians facilitate diagnosis and enable the best clinical management [22,23]. Combining imagining with Artificial Intelligence bears huge potential in the future for achieving systematic user-independent assessments [24]. Many aspects of burn wounds may be relevant for prognosis, with depth, localization and size being only very rough estimators of a complex biological process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This OCT burn depth score complements other widely used scores to help us as clinicians facilitate diagnosis and enable the best clinical management [22,23]. Combining imagining with Artificial Intelligence bears huge potential in the future for achieving systematic user-independent assessments [24]. Many aspects of burn wounds may be relevant for prognosis, with depth, localization and size being only very rough estimators of a complex biological process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%