Review of Mathematical Methodology for Electric Power Optimization Problems

Han, Dong; Tong, Xiaojiao

doi:10.1007/s40305-020-00304-x

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The excitation system time constant is much smaller than the prime mover time constant and its transient decay much faster and does not affect the LFC dynamic. Thus, the cross-coupling between the LFC loop and the AVR loop is negligible, and the load frequency and excitation voltage control are analyzed independently (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamic Response of Multi Area Load Frequency Control through Different Computational Techniques

Dhamanda¹,

Dutt²

2022

IJST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To employ optimization technique (GA (Genetic Algorithm) Technique) to solve the problem of power generation, by means of mathematical approach to formulate the problem mathematically. Methods: Thermal units have been taken as a source of power generation. Transfer function model of thermal generating units has been developed and simulated through MATLAB Simulink software. The main issue of power generation is the continuous mismatching in the generation and consumption of electricity due to which continuous the change in frequency and corresponding power becomes a major issue, which need to be maintained in constancy for regular operation. For this purpose, optimization technique (GA Technique), PI (Proportional Plus Integral), PID (Proportional Plus Integral Plus Derivative) technique have been used to solve the issue of frequency and corresponding power. Findings: Solve the issues of change in frequency and corresponding tie line power, a table has been drawn for batter comparison. Novelty: The comparative results obtained from all technique have been put in table which shows that the optimization technique (GA Technique) gives very effective, efficient and dynamic results (8 Sec and 11 Sec in Frequency & Power Variation) compared to traditional technique (PI, PID) (28 Sec, 44 Sec & 27 Sec & 43 Sec in Frequency & Power Variation).

show abstract