2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2004.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of measured crop water productivity values for irrigated wheat, rice, cotton and maize

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

38
392
5
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 787 publications
(443 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
38
392
5
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Ye et al (2013) reported that the WP IR s of intermittently irrigated TPR in the Taihu Lake Basin were between 0.48 and 1.06 kg/m 3 for different fertilizer managements, with average values of 0.88 and 0.77 kg/m 3 during the 2010 and 2011 seasons, respectively. The WP ET s in our experiments fall in the range of globally measured values for rice (0.6-1.6 kg/m 3 ), and are higher than the average value (1.09 kg/m 3 ) (Zwart and Bastiaanssen, 2004) but slightly lower than the median value of 1.52 kg/m 3 (ranging from 0.89-2.03 kg/m 3 ) reported by Roost et al (2008) for TPR of the Zhanghe Irrigation District in Central China. The evaluated water productivities indicated that DSR in the 2008 season had a better water use efficiency compared to DSR in the 2009 season, and that the DSR in the 2009 season sufficiently used rainfall.…”
Section: Water Balance and Productivitymentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Ye et al (2013) reported that the WP IR s of intermittently irrigated TPR in the Taihu Lake Basin were between 0.48 and 1.06 kg/m 3 for different fertilizer managements, with average values of 0.88 and 0.77 kg/m 3 during the 2010 and 2011 seasons, respectively. The WP ET s in our experiments fall in the range of globally measured values for rice (0.6-1.6 kg/m 3 ), and are higher than the average value (1.09 kg/m 3 ) (Zwart and Bastiaanssen, 2004) but slightly lower than the median value of 1.52 kg/m 3 (ranging from 0.89-2.03 kg/m 3 ) reported by Roost et al (2008) for TPR of the Zhanghe Irrigation District in Central China. The evaluated water productivities indicated that DSR in the 2008 season had a better water use efficiency compared to DSR in the 2009 season, and that the DSR in the 2009 season sufficiently used rainfall.…”
Section: Water Balance and Productivitymentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Research conducted in a Mediterranean region found that sweet sorghum was more water-use-efficient than major grain crops, including maize, wheat, barley, and soybean (Katerji & Mastrorilli, 2014). However, the WUE of sorghum has been shown to vary with environment, management, and sub-type, which has been reported for other species (Zwart & Bastiaanssen, 2004). In a literature review we found that the mean WUE of sorghum was 3.4 g kg -1 , including both irrigated and rain-fed reports for biomass, sweet, and grain varieties (Table 1.1).…”
Section: Chapter 1 Water-use-efficiency Of Sorghummentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Plants that utilize the C4 photosynthetic pathway are more water-use-efficient than C3 species in both natural and managed ecosystems (Sage & Monson, 1998;Zwart & Bastiaanssen, 2004;Katerji & Mastrorilli, 2014). The greater WUE of the C4 pathway is due to a CO2 concentrating mechanism in specialized bundle sheath cells that permits high photosynthetic rates with reduced stomatal conductance in C4 plants, relative to C3 plants (Sage & Monson, 1998).…”
Section: Chapter 1 Water-use-efficiency Of Sorghummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, AWD and AWDS did not enhance the resultant WP owing to the no significant difference in rice grain yield among treatments. Increasing WP implies either to produce the same yield with less water or to obtain greater crop yield with the same water volume (Zwart and Bastiaanssen 2004). To make AWD feasible under the local environmental and socioeconomic conditions, further study is necessary to elucidate the minimum water requirement of the cultivar used.…”
Section: Rice Productivity and Water Saving Under Awdmentioning
confidence: 99%