2020
DOI: 10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.14.3.2020.28-54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Methods and Tools for Intellectual Property Analysis of Public Sector Entities

Abstract: The low efficiency of intellectual property (IP) in the public sector in our current economic environment is largely due to the insufficient development of the prevailing accounting and analytical system. Analytical methods, and the information basis of their application, are the core of this system. The formation of an accounting and analytical system consistent with the development priorities of public sector entities requires special research.This article provides a review of the methods and tools of analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These conclusions are of practical importance for large and medium-size companies, which are looking for tools to increase the availability of financial resources in a faltering economy. In particular, a low efficiency of intel-lectual property is observed in the public sector [24] due to its underdeveloped accounting and analysis system. Patent analysis is another method that can be used for intellectual property analysis to solve economic problems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conclusions are of practical importance for large and medium-size companies, which are looking for tools to increase the availability of financial resources in a faltering economy. In particular, a low efficiency of intel-lectual property is observed in the public sector [24] due to its underdeveloped accounting and analysis system. Patent analysis is another method that can be used for intellectual property analysis to solve economic problems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%