2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1190-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of methods for objective surgical skill evaluation

Abstract: In this paper, we provide a clinical motivation for the importance of surgical skill evaluation. We review the current methods of tracking surgical motion and the available data-collection systems. We also survey current methods of surgical skill evaluation and show that most approaches fall into one of three methods: (1) structured human grading; (2) descriptive statistics; or (3) statistical language models of surgical motion. We discuss the need for an encompassing approach to model human skill through stat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
164
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
164
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The definition and equation of the analytical parameters are indicated in Table 2. Although parameters, such as total operating time or total path length of the surgical instrument, are often used for surgical skill assessment in similar studies 17) , these parameters were excluded to find features of endoscope manipulation that do not depend on the operating time, as it can be assumed that with more surgical experience, time-dependent parameters would become lower. All the analytical parameters used in this study were calculated from only the endoscope tracking information.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Endoscope Manipulation 221 Paramementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition and equation of the analytical parameters are indicated in Table 2. Although parameters, such as total operating time or total path length of the surgical instrument, are often used for surgical skill assessment in similar studies 17) , these parameters were excluded to find features of endoscope manipulation that do not depend on the operating time, as it can be assumed that with more surgical experience, time-dependent parameters would become lower. All the analytical parameters used in this study were calculated from only the endoscope tracking information.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Endoscope Manipulation 221 Paramementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical evidence suggests that the level of technical expertise is represented by the proper handling of surgical equipment in such a way that this is efficient and minimizes the risk for errors occurring. 97,98 In addition, virtually all established endovascular GRS and checklists contain criteria, that evaluate three key technical attributes, summarized as: 1) avoiding vessel wall damage with precise catheter manipulation, especially near delicate or sclerotic areas; 2) smooth timely catheter navigation without unnecessary movements; 3) efficient use of the imaging modalities and contrast agents. Inspired by this, we expanded skill assessment by focusing on 1) and 2) and hypothesized that quantitative measures extracted from analyzing medical images and tracking the instruments trajectory, combined appropriately, will contain the necessary information to discriminate experience levels.…”
Section: Skill Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structured human grading is an extension of the traditional observational approach where a senior surgeon observes a student and provides verbal feedback. In multiple surgical fields, structured grading techniques often attempt to standardize evaluation through rated checklists that assess performance of fundamental tasks on inanimate bench top models [17]. The Global Rating Scale for Endovascular Performance (GRSEP) is a structured grading tool that is used by a senior clinician to assess each subject based on their performance in endovascular skills.…”
Section: Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%