Proceedings of 2016 International Conference on Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays (UHECR2016) 2018
DOI: 10.7566/jpscp.19.011018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Model Predictions for Extensive Air Showers

Abstract: In detailed air shower simulations, the uncertainty in the prediction of shower observable for different primary particles and energies is currently dominated by differences between hadronic interaction models. With the results of the first run of the LHC, the difference between post-LHC model predictions has been reduced at the same level as experimental uncertainties of cosmic ray experiments. At the same time new types of air shower observables, like the muon production depth, have been measured, adding new… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first involves measuring the properties of air showers when cosmic rays interact in the atmosphere, and has been used extensively by Auger and TA. This method relies on the measurement of the depth into the atmosphere at which the maximum fluorescence light is produced, X max , and comparing this to simulations using hadronic models, which still have considerable uncertainties [10,11]. Additionally, the muon flux from the shower can also be used to determine the evolution of the shower through X µ max , but there the hadronic models generally do not describe the data well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first involves measuring the properties of air showers when cosmic rays interact in the atmosphere, and has been used extensively by Auger and TA. This method relies on the measurement of the depth into the atmosphere at which the maximum fluorescence light is produced, X max , and comparing this to simulations using hadronic models, which still have considerable uncertainties [10,11]. Additionally, the muon flux from the shower can also be used to determine the evolution of the shower through X µ max , but there the hadronic models generally do not describe the data well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer the reader to refs. [25,69,91,[98][99][100][101] for discussions on the impact of different hadronic-interaction models on cosmic-ray data.…”
Section: Hadronic-interaction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%