2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1609.07196
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of multi-fidelity models

Abstract: Simulations are often computationally expensive and the need for multiple realizations, as in uncertainty quantification or optimization, makes surrogate models an attractive option. For expensive high-fidelity models (HFMs), however, even performing the number of simulations needed for fitting a surrogate may be too expensive. Inexpensive but less accurate low-fidelity models (LFMs) are often also available. Multi-fidelity models (MFMs) combine HFMs and LFMs in order to achieve accuracy at a reasonable cost. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(113 reference statements)
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the past decades, many multi-fidelity models have been proposed to fulfill this goal. We refer to (Fernández-Godino et al, 2016) and (Peherstorfer et al, 2018) for detailed literature reviews. Among all of the methods, GP based approaches have caught most attention in this area due to their ability to incorporate prior beliefs, interpolate complex functional patterns and quantify uncertainties (Fernández-Godino et al, 2016).…”
Section: Application I: Multi-fidelity Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During the past decades, many multi-fidelity models have been proposed to fulfill this goal. We refer to (Fernández-Godino et al, 2016) and (Peherstorfer et al, 2018) for detailed literature reviews. Among all of the methods, GP based approaches have caught most attention in this area due to their ability to incorporate prior beliefs, interpolate complex functional patterns and quantify uncertainties (Fernández-Godino et al, 2016).…”
Section: Application I: Multi-fidelity Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to (Fernández-Godino et al, 2016) and (Peherstorfer et al, 2018) for detailed literature reviews. Among all of the methods, GP based approaches have caught most attention in this area due to their ability to incorporate prior beliefs, interpolate complex functional patterns and quantify uncertainties (Fernández-Godino et al, 2016). The last ability is critical to fuse observations across different fidelities effectively.…”
Section: Application I: Multi-fidelity Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison to the conventional single-task learning, multi-task learning (MTL) [1] provides a new learning paradigm to leverage knowledge across re-lated tasks for improving the generalization performance of tasks. The community of multi-task learning has overlaps with other domains like transfer learning [2], multi-view learning [3] and multi-fidelity modeling [4]. Among current MTL paradigms, multi-task Gaussian process (MTGP), the topic of this paper, inherits the non-parametric, Bayesian property of Gaussian process (GP) [5] to have not only the prediction mean but also the associated prediction variance, thus showcasing widespread applications, e.g., multi-task regression and classification, multi-variate time series analysis [6], multi-task Bayesian optimization [7,8], and multi-view learning [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been a surging interest in developing efficient uncertainty quantification algorithms by leveraging the strengths of multiple models where costs and fidelity, to be intended as the capacity of correctly describing the problem under consideration, vary. This approach is known in the literature as the multi-fidelity method [27,79,80].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%