2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of numerical computation of compressible flows with artificial interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, it has been shown that the use of a Chapman-Enskog distribution leads to somewhat higher accuracy as compared to a Maxwellian distribution in hybrid DSMC-Navier Stokes simulations of a Couette flow, which is an extreme example of a strongly non-equilibrium flow driven purely by gradient effects [58]. Based on these findings, many recent papers on hybrid DSMC-Navier Stokes simulations have applied a Chapman-Enskog distribution [29,31,61,20,63,62]. Other authors, on the other hand, have chosen to apply a Maxwellian distribution in hybrid DSMC-Navier Stokes simulations, arguing that the use of a Chapman-Enskog distribution leads to a small improvement in accuracy [59,65] which does not justify the largely increased computational costs [60], or because of the fact that the Chapman-Enskog distribution becomes negative with deviation from the Maxwellian distribution [59], or because of the observation that for specific flows a greater mismatch at the interface between Navier Stokes and DSMC was observed for a ChapmanEnskog distribution as compared to a Maxwellian distribution [64].…”
Section: The Hybrid Cfd/dsmc Approachmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Indeed, it has been shown that the use of a Chapman-Enskog distribution leads to somewhat higher accuracy as compared to a Maxwellian distribution in hybrid DSMC-Navier Stokes simulations of a Couette flow, which is an extreme example of a strongly non-equilibrium flow driven purely by gradient effects [58]. Based on these findings, many recent papers on hybrid DSMC-Navier Stokes simulations have applied a Chapman-Enskog distribution [29,31,61,20,63,62]. Other authors, on the other hand, have chosen to apply a Maxwellian distribution in hybrid DSMC-Navier Stokes simulations, arguing that the use of a Chapman-Enskog distribution leads to a small improvement in accuracy [59,65] which does not justify the largely increased computational costs [60], or because of the fact that the Chapman-Enskog distribution becomes negative with deviation from the Maxwellian distribution [59], or because of the observation that for specific flows a greater mismatch at the interface between Navier Stokes and DSMC was observed for a ChapmanEnskog distribution as compared to a Maxwellian distribution [64].…”
Section: The Hybrid Cfd/dsmc Approachmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The Yin-Yang grid has a disadvantage common with other types of overlapping grids (see, e.g., Chesshire & Henshaw 1994;Wang 1995;Wu et al 2007). The communication via interpolation between the two grid patches does not guarantee conservation of conserved quantities even though the finitevolume difference scheme employed on each grid patch is conservative.…”
Section: Conservation Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unstructured hybrid meshes would also typically adopt a thin O mesh in the inner wall layer. Non-conformal interfaces of the patched or overlapped type would certainly enhance the grid quality, at the price of additional computational complexities and some local loss of accuracy occurring on the fine-to-coarse boundaries [70]. Local grid skewness accompanied by a potential lack of smoothness will pollute the numerical solution obtained with low-order methods, introducing spurious entropy generation largely affecting the features of the vortex shedding flow.…”
Section: Numerical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%