2023
DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/acaab2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of pMUTs for medical imaging: towards high frequency arrays

Abstract: pMUT (piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasound Transducer) devices are an alternative that can overcome the limitations associated with conventional ultrasound transducers. pMUT’s are reported for many applications such as range-finding, biometrics, and ultrasound imaging. However, pulse-echo measurements from fabricated pMUT devices/arrays are not commonly reported in literature, a reason being lack of desirable performance either in transmit or receive mode of operation. There is also limited information about… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shaded areas indicate the standard error. As expected from the recording/reference locations on the forehead and consistent with the findings in Schalk et al (2023), the responses are smaller in amplitude and visually different than those measured with more common montages (e.g., Cz referenced to the earlobe). At the same time, they clearly detect EEG responses to visual stimulation, and they are different for oddball and standard stimulation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shaded areas indicate the standard error. As expected from the recording/reference locations on the forehead and consistent with the findings in Schalk et al (2023), the responses are smaller in amplitude and visually different than those measured with more common montages (e.g., Cz referenced to the earlobe). At the same time, they clearly detect EEG responses to visual stimulation, and they are different for oddball and standard stimulation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It is almost certain that such (and other) measurements cannot be accomplished using sensors that are placed in a completely different location such as on the head. Likewise, optimization of practicality almost certainly requires placing electrodes outside the hair (e.g., on the forehead or around/inside the ear), but these locations will not provide optimal access to EEG signals that are typically detected in more central locations (Schalk et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%