2022
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.913683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Radiomics- and Dosiomics-based Predicting Models for Rectal Cancer

Abstract: By breaking the traditional medical image analysis framework, precision medicine–radiomics has attracted much attention in the past decade. The use of various mathematical algorithms offers radiomics the ability to extract vast amounts of detailed features from medical images for quantitative analysis and analyzes the confidential information related to the tumor in the image, which can establish valuable disease diagnosis and prognosis models to support personalized clinical decisions. This article summarizes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the DVH features only describe the distribution of dose in general terms during radiotherapy and do not give a specific three-dimensional representation of the radiotherapy dose. The dosiomics method can describe dose distribution by intensity, texture, shape and other dose characteristics with high accuracy, granularity and spatial information, and is an effective method for parameterizing radiotherapy dose distribution [ 15 ]. It has been shown that dosiomics features based on dosimetry can be more effective in several directions such as local control after carbon-ion radiotherapy for skull base chordoma [ 16 ], prediction of weight loss in the acute phase in lung cancer patients receiving radiotherapy [ 17 ] and exploring the interaction between radiation and lymphocytopenia in lung cancer patients [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the DVH features only describe the distribution of dose in general terms during radiotherapy and do not give a specific three-dimensional representation of the radiotherapy dose. The dosiomics method can describe dose distribution by intensity, texture, shape and other dose characteristics with high accuracy, granularity and spatial information, and is an effective method for parameterizing radiotherapy dose distribution [ 15 ]. It has been shown that dosiomics features based on dosimetry can be more effective in several directions such as local control after carbon-ion radiotherapy for skull base chordoma [ 16 ], prediction of weight loss in the acute phase in lung cancer patients receiving radiotherapy [ 17 ] and exploring the interaction between radiation and lymphocytopenia in lung cancer patients [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of radiation toxicity in rectal cancer can be enhanced through the use of image-based features, which aid physicians in mitigating radiation risks and determining the feasibility of local tumor control [6,7]. Radiomics, a novel imaging analysis approach, involves the quantification of high-dimensional data extracted from medical images, providing valuable information about pathophysiological properties [8][9][10]. In the context of radiotherapy, radiomics feature analysis of the target volume and organs at risk (OARs) can have various applications, such as diagnostics, risk stratification, disease-free survival prediction, automatic segmentation, target volume definition, toxicity prognosis, treatment plan optimization, adaptive re-planning, decision support, treatment response assessment, and follow-up [8,[11][12][13].…”
Section: The Potential Of Radiomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since CT is the most commonly used staging method for esophageal cancer (EC) and gastric cancer (GC), most radiomics studies on EC and GC are based on CT images[ 5 - 9 ]. In contrast, as MRI is widely used for colorectal cancer (CRC) staging, most radiomics studies on CRC are based on MRI features[ 10 - 13 ].…”
Section: Radiomics Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%