2011
DOI: 10.1017/s0261444811000292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of recent research (2000–2010) on learning and instruction with specific reference to L2 Japanese

Abstract: This review aims to identify major issues in and the direction of recent L2 Japanese research by reviewing over 200 empirical studies published in English or Japanese between 2000 and 2010. The first part of this article examines topics in second language acquisition (SLA) research with regard to L2 Japanese, including vocabulary andkanji(Chinese characters transferred into Japanese) learning, syntactic development, reading and writing in L2 Japanese, interlanguage pragmatics and language socialization, affect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
(202 reference statements)
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless, this line of research on interlanguage pragmatics, overtly or covertly, endorses monolingual standards where the goal of pragmatic development tends to be described (and prescribed) vis-à-vis the native speaker yardstick. Concerns regarding this widely accepted practice of setting monolingual native speaker models as an ultimate goal were raised by Mori and Mori (2011), but this tendency has remained prevalent. Ajioka's (2011) study specifically asked the question of what constitutes ‘native-likeness’ by analyzing how native speakers of Japanese residing in Tokyo, who are not academic researchers, perceived L2 Japanese speech during and after listening to audio-recorded interviews involving four learners.…”
Section: Social Dimensions Of L2 Japanese Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Regardless, this line of research on interlanguage pragmatics, overtly or covertly, endorses monolingual standards where the goal of pragmatic development tends to be described (and prescribed) vis-à-vis the native speaker yardstick. Concerns regarding this widely accepted practice of setting monolingual native speaker models as an ultimate goal were raised by Mori and Mori (2011), but this tendency has remained prevalent. Ajioka's (2011) study specifically asked the question of what constitutes ‘native-likeness’ by analyzing how native speakers of Japanese residing in Tokyo, who are not academic researchers, perceived L2 Japanese speech during and after listening to audio-recorded interviews involving four learners.…”
Section: Social Dimensions Of L2 Japanese Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given changes in the demographics of L2 Japanese learners seen in the last decade and emerging trends in applied linguistics and SLA research, however, the examination of how post-2010 studies on L2 Japanese development, use and education respond to these developments is in order. According to the 2015 survey on Japanese language education abroad conducted by the Japan Foundation (2017), the number of Japanese language learners outside of Japan was over 3.65 million, which is more than a 22% increase from the 2006 data cited in Mori and Mori (2011). The fluctuation of learner population, however, is not uniform across countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Taking a different approach from Mori and Mori (2011), which reviewed research on L2 acquisition and instruction of Japanese from 2001 to 2010, it briefly summarizes frequently cited studies in L2 acquisition research. Taking a different approach from Mori and Mori (2011), which reviewed research on L2 acquisition and instruction of Japanese from 2001 to 2010, it briefly summarizes frequently cited studies in L2 acquisition research.…”
Section: Second Language Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%