2016
DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1140693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of receptor modeling methods for source apportionment

Abstract: Efforts have been made over the past 50 years to use air quality data to estimate the influence of air pollution sources. These methods are now relatively mature and many are readily accessible through publically available software. This review examines the development of receptor models and the current state of the art in extracting source identification and apportionments from ambient air quality data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
274
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 499 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
2
274
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EPA, 2014), while the best practice and standards are extensively reviewed in several papers (e.g. Reff et al, 2007;Belis et al, 2014;Brown et al, 2015;Hopke, 2016). SMPS data at 5 min resolution were used as the PMF input matrix.…”
Section: Data Handling and Chemometric Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EPA, 2014), while the best practice and standards are extensively reviewed in several papers (e.g. Reff et al, 2007;Belis et al, 2014;Brown et al, 2015;Hopke, 2016). SMPS data at 5 min resolution were used as the PMF input matrix.…”
Section: Data Handling and Chemometric Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for uncertainties in back trajectory analysis, every hour a set of 15 back trajectories was calculated that was composed of five different plane locations (one exactly at the measurement station and four in close proximity around it) at three altitudes (100, 200 and 300 m above the surface level). We apply the PSCF model according to Hopke (2016) on hourly average N CN values with the 75 % percentile as threshold value. The threshold value defines which N CN value is considered as a high concentration.…”
Section: Pscf Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods include Potential Source Contribution Function (PSCF) (Ashbaugh et al, 1985;Zeng and Hopke, 1989), Residence Time Weighted Concentration (RTWC) (Stohl, 1996;Zhou et al, 2004), and Simplified Quantitative Trajectory Bias Analysis (SQTBA) (Zhou et al, 2004;Brook et al, 2004). These methods have been described in detail by Hopke (2016). The trajectories were computed using HYSPLIT (Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) model (Stein et al, 2015), based on the NOAA-NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis data with 2.5° × 2.5° horizontal resolution and 17 pressure levels (Kalnay et al, 1996).…”
Section: Trajectory Ensemble Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%