2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5054-1_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review Of Recommendations For Forest Energy Harvesting And Wood Ash Recycling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
18

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
26
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Mandatory or voluntary site-level guidelines are one of the key mechanisms employed by jurisdictions, globally, for ensuring that long-term forest productivity is sustainable, including when additional harvest material beyond those used for traditional wood products (i.e., sawlogs, pulpwood) are removed for bioenergy production (Stupak et al 2008). However, as pointed out by Abbas et al (2011), there is no consensus on the amount of logging residue retention required to maintain long-term site productivity, and this knowledge gap is largely due to the limited number of long-term studies in the published literature (Janowiak and Webster 2010;Thiffault et al 2011).…”
Section: Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mandatory or voluntary site-level guidelines are one of the key mechanisms employed by jurisdictions, globally, for ensuring that long-term forest productivity is sustainable, including when additional harvest material beyond those used for traditional wood products (i.e., sawlogs, pulpwood) are removed for bioenergy production (Stupak et al 2008). However, as pointed out by Abbas et al (2011), there is no consensus on the amount of logging residue retention required to maintain long-term site productivity, and this knowledge gap is largely due to the limited number of long-term studies in the published literature (Janowiak and Webster 2010;Thiffault et al 2011).…”
Section: Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have also demonstrated that applications of wood ash on forest soils can be used to replace some of the nutrients (e.g., phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), potassium (K)) removed during forest harvesting, to counteract the acidifying effects of atmospheric deposition on forest soils and surface water bodies, and to improve tree growth (Augusto et al 2008;Reid and Watmough 2014;Huotari et al 2015). In several European countries, forest soil applications of wood ash are encouraged, particularly on sites from which harvesting residues have been removed for bioenergy production (Swedish Forest Agency 2008;Stupak et al 2008;Forestry Commission 2009). Thus, disposal of wood ash in Canadian landfills may represent a wasted opportunity to obtain greater economic value from forest biomass and to more sustainably manage the forest resource by closing a loop in the cycling of nutrients during forestry operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The General Guidelines for State Forest Management is a compilation of several policies, strategies, and prescriptions developed through the 1990s and 2000s, and it is unclear if parts are carried over from previous forest legislation. It is noteworthy that the 1985 guidelines for harvesting of forest wood chips are not included in the General Guidelines for State Forest Management .…”
Section: Governance and Ngo Positionsmentioning
confidence: 99%