Review of research studies on population specific epidemic disasters

Abstract

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. AbstractPurpose -This study aims to analyze the epidemic modeling applications and policy-making strategies for six different infectious diseases in a number of countries, thus comparing and contrasting research in underdeveloped, developing, and developed countries. Design/methodology/approach -A systematic review has been conducted by identifying relevant studies for six diseases from different sources and selecting 74 publications for inclusion. These selected publications are classified and analyzed based on infectious disease, control policies, theme and objective, methodology, origin of population data, publication year and results. Findings -Review results indicate that disaster preparedness and surveillance plans for epidemics are available mostly for developed countries. There is a need for further research in both developing and developed countries because of the ease of dispersion, which constitutes a universal threat. Analysis of the publications suggests that epidemic disasters are mostly studied by researchers in the field of medicine or biology with the aim of assessing the potential impact of an epidemic. The authors highlight the need for further research in operations research and disaster management fields and propose further research directions in the area of disaster management. Social implications -This review emphasizes the importance of epidemic disaster modeling for the preparedness stage of disaster management and policy making. Disease and population-specific intervention policies (e.g. vaccination) reported in this review should set an example and help policy makers during their decision making. Originality/value -Potential use of the epidemiological modeling on further planning and decision-making issues in the context of disaster management is studied for the first time.

Reverse Logistics Network Design for Effective Management of Medical Waste in Epidemic Outbreaks: Insights from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in Wuhan (China)

“…Boomee et al [1] compared the performance of several network design models in different stages of decision-making. Taking into account six infectious diseases, Adivar and Selen [15] provided an extensive literature review on the applications of epidemic modeling and the policy-making strategy.…”

Facilitating Resilience during an African Swine Fever Outbreak in the Austrian Pork Supply Chain through Hybrid Simulation Modelling

“…To represent the epidemiological course of a disease, Susceptible-(Exposed)-Infectious-Recovered (S(E)IR) models are the most widely used method [63,64]. Other stages, such as quarantine, immunity, isolation, etc., can be included depending on the disease and the purpose of the simulation [65]. The simulation model was implemented with the software tool AnyLogic 8 University.…”

Disasters and long-term economic sustainability: a perspective on Sierra Leone

“…Biophysical hazards -cholera, Ebola Pre-existing and complex vulnerabilities are ubiquitous in developing countries consequently increasing the risks of biophysical hazards. Infectious diseases like cholera and recent occurrence of Ebola (Hewlett and Amolat, 2003;Connolly et al, 2004;Sack, 2011;Rancourt, 2013;WHO, 2014;Adivar and Selen, 2013;Bausch and Schwarz, 2014;Pose and Rabinowitz, 2014) have had deleterious effects for Sierra Leone (Figures 7 and 8). During the conflict, Sierra Leone's public health system and critical infrastructure had taken a hit leaving the system fragmented and barely functional.…”