2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Robotic Infrastructure Inspection Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, surveillance might be helped by technological advances (e.g., pipe crawler ROVs or snake robots; Sanfilippo et al 2016, Lattanzi and Miller 2017) that could facilitate deeper swabs and pair swabbing data with finer‐scale measurements of temperature and humidity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, surveillance might be helped by technological advances (e.g., pipe crawler ROVs or snake robots; Sanfilippo et al 2016, Lattanzi and Miller 2017) that could facilitate deeper swabs and pair swabbing data with finer‐scale measurements of temperature and humidity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced sensing technologies facilitate inspection and data collection processes. For example, collecting 3D surface data by using Stereovision and Light Detection And Ranging (LIDAR) [149], utilizing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), and robots such as Pioneer P3-AT and Pioneer 3-DX for inspection purposes [150]. Future studies should be conducted to investigate these technologies and their impacts on the cost, safety, and accuracy of data collection to identify high impact technologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crack detection in the spatial domain using the Roberts filter resulted in the lowest number of TPs (32), but it also resulted in the lowest FP (5). Thus, while the Roberts filter was the least accurate (77%), its precision (86%) was among the highest.…”
Section: Spatial Domain Roberts Filtermentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Such inspections are costly, time-consuming, and labor-intensive [2,3]. Autonomous inspection could be a cost-effective solution to these problems if the accuracy of human inspection can be matched [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Image-based inspection of infrastructure for concrete delamination [10][11][12][13], cracks [14][15][16][17], and spalls [18,19] using unmanned aerial systems (UASs) have been proven effective based on previous literature [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%