2007
DOI: 10.1002/joc.1540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of scenario selection and downscaling methods for the assessment of climate change impacts on hydrology in the United States pacific northwest

Abstract: Abstract:This paper reviews methods that have been used to evaluate global climate simulations and to downscale global climate scenarios for the assessment of climate impacts on hydrologic systems in the Pacific Northwest, USA. The approach described has been developed to facilitate integrated assessment research in support of regional resource management. Global climate model scenarios are evaluated and selected based on historic 20th century simulations. A statistical downscaling method is then applied to pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
123
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to future climate change, Pan et al (2004) show a possible 4% increase in incoming solar radiation for the Portland area for summer 2040 (JJA) and 4% decrease for Phoenix, mainly as a function of monsoon changes in July and August. In more recent downscaling and modelling efforts, Salathe et al (2007) suggest Portland summer precipitation may decline slightly, which is consistent with the direction of change indicated by Pan et al (2004) for incoming solar radiation. Bresson and Laprise (2011) explicitly produce scenarios of the water budget by winter and summer seasons (DJF and JJA) in their use of the Canadian Regional Climate Model for North America in which regional ET is mapped for changes from 1961-1990 to 2041-2071.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With respect to future climate change, Pan et al (2004) show a possible 4% increase in incoming solar radiation for the Portland area for summer 2040 (JJA) and 4% decrease for Phoenix, mainly as a function of monsoon changes in July and August. In more recent downscaling and modelling efforts, Salathe et al (2007) suggest Portland summer precipitation may decline slightly, which is consistent with the direction of change indicated by Pan et al (2004) for incoming solar radiation. Bresson and Laprise (2011) explicitly produce scenarios of the water budget by winter and summer seasons (DJF and JJA) in their use of the Canadian Regional Climate Model for North America in which regional ET is mapped for changes from 1961-1990 to 2041-2071.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Bresson and Laprise (2011) explicitly produce scenarios of the water budget by winter and summer seasons (DJF and JJA) in their use of the Canadian Regional Climate Model for North America in which regional ET is mapped for changes from 1961-1990 to 2041-2071. Interpolating for the Pacific Northwest near Portland and for the Southwest United States near Phoenix from their Figure 13 (showing JJA projected differences), changes consistent with Pan et al (2004) and Salathe et al (2007) interpretations are noted with very little ET increases for Portland and some decreases in ET for summer in Phoenix (again for the combined JJA period). Thus, it is possible that by 2040, our minimum estimates for solar radiation may be appropriate for Phoenix and maximum estimates appropriate for Portland as a scenario to consider from the results of Table VI. Local effects of pollution on solar radiation in the urban area compared with rural environments may also be significant in scenario constructs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…There is evidence to suggest that it is preferable to apply the native GCM-predicted climate anomalies to observed data in order to construct climate scenarios rather than derive them directly from the regional climate model simulations or by statistical downscaling (e.g. Arnell et al, 2003;Salathé et al, 2007) The comparison of future climatic conditions from 13 GCMs provides several important observations. First, there is significant variation in future conditions across the different models, even though all models were forced with the same emissions scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We address both the magnitudes of effects and the temporal scales at which they operate because when the magnitude and direction of two different changes are equal, those that occur over shorter periods will appear more sudden and be more difficult to anticipate. We use both composite climate model output and scenarios based on individual climate models, statistically downscaled to 1/16 th degree resolution (Salathé et al 2007;Salathé 2009, this report, Elsner et al 2009, this report), for future projections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%