2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of smallholder palm oil sustainability reveals limited positive impacts and identifies key implementation and knowledge gaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, RSPO, along with other certification approaches, are criticized for their market approach that is: (1) based on the logic of rewards from increasing market access and sales instead of sustainable production and; (2) links more sustainable products with customers' consuming ability [53]. Limitations in presenting solutions for smallholders are also mentioned as a fundamental weakness of the certification system (30). Critiques also highlight the ineffectiveness of the RSPO in overcoming land grabbing, as some RSPO-certified plantations are still involved in land conflicts with local communities [31].…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Development Of Palm Oil Plantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, RSPO, along with other certification approaches, are criticized for their market approach that is: (1) based on the logic of rewards from increasing market access and sales instead of sustainable production and; (2) links more sustainable products with customers' consuming ability [53]. Limitations in presenting solutions for smallholders are also mentioned as a fundamental weakness of the certification system (30). Critiques also highlight the ineffectiveness of the RSPO in overcoming land grabbing, as some RSPO-certified plantations are still involved in land conflicts with local communities [31].…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Development Of Palm Oil Plantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, firstly, smallholder which refers to people's plantations located illegally in forest areas creates challenges for small farmers to gain access to funding, harvests, and obtain sustainable certification, certification standards experience difficulties in resolving challenges. faced by small farmers, low income, low crop yields, and land ownership insecurity [24], then how Good Agricultural Practice (GAP) studies can affect productivity and welfare [25], access to certification for farmers, they are very dependent on external facilitators [26].…”
Section: Density Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 100 articles indexed by Scopus, they can be grouped into 3 clusters which can be identified by color node each keyword. Cluster 1 is symbolized in red and includes terms related to studies with keywords Farmer [1][2][3][4][5][6], Standard [7][8][9][10], Impact [11][12][13] , Access [14], ISPO [15][16][17][18][19] it can be interpreted that the studies on the cluster referred to one and the other study keywords often intersect and tend to have links, for example research with studies on financial and benefits certification on one the articles in the study cover a lot of discussion related to the keywords impact, farmer and standards Cluster 2, which is symbolized in yellow, consists of studies that tend to lead to one keyword, namely RSPO certification [20][21][22][23][24][25][26], Cluster 3, which is symbolized in blue, consists of Oil Palm studies [27,28], Deforestation, Plantation, Biodiversity and Cluster 4 which is symbolized in green consists of MSPO certification studies, Industry, Independent Smallholder, Implementation. From the visualization of the network visualization, there is an interesting thing, namely that there is a high link to the study with the keywords of sustainable oil palm plantation certification namely ISPO, RSPO, and MSPO during the period from 2006 to 2023…”
Section: Network Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%