Review of species of the genus Macropsidius Ribaut, 1952 (Homoptera: Cicadellidae: Macropsinae) of Russia and adjacent territories

Tishechkin, D. Yu.

doi:10.15298/rusentj.23.3.01

Cited by 11 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In such situations character displacement in male genital morphology as an adaptation to prevent hybridization between syntopic, closely related species (Shapiro & Porter, ; Eberhard, ) may not necessarily be expected. Highly divergent male vibrational calls in the absence of divergence in male genitalia have been described also in the leafhopper genus Macropsis (Tishechkin, ). Similarly, a high level of divergence in vibrational songs found in sympatric lacewings species of the Chrysoperla carnea group is accompanied by very similar male genital morphology across the complex (reviewed in Henry et al , ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Integrating vibrational signals, mitochondrial DNA and morphology for species determination in the genus Aphrodes (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae)

Bluemel

Derlink

Pavlovčič

et al. 2014

Systematic Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reliable delimitation and identification of species is central not only to systematics, but also to studies of biodiversity, ecology and pest management. In the era of Internet‐based biodiversity databases misidentifications are rapidly disseminated and may have far‐reaching consequences. Leafhoppers from the genus Aphrodes (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae) are common and abundant, but, nevertheless, they are still a taxonomically challenging group whose members are often assessed in ecological studies and are also potential vectors of plant diseases. Previous study has shown that the syntype series for A. aestuarina (Edwards) includes also specimens of A. makarovi Zachvatkin and has suggested that misidentifications may be widespread in museum collections. We studied Aphrodes individuals collected from the U.K. and Slovenia in order to provide a more comprehensive analysis of this genus using multiple criteria. Combined work using male and female vibrational signals emitted during courtship, and a 600‐bp fragment within the barcoding region of the COI mtDNA gene, provided validated specimens that we also used for morphometric study. Analyses confirmed A. aestuarina, A. bicincta, A. diminuta and A. makarovi as behaviourally, genetically and morphologically distinct species. Although any of these approaches could be used alone to distinguish between species, combining morphological and molecular approaches will help to improve reliability, especially when identifying females. Morphological investigation of validated individuals from the U.K. and Slovenia also revealed geographic differences within species. By combining several body and aedeagus morphological characters males can be reliably identified, however, morphological differences between species are, nevertheless, relatively small. By contrast, observed genetic distances between Aphrodes species are relatively large (4.2–7.0%). At about half of our collecting sites more than one Aphrodes species was found and A. makarovi was collected together with every other species, including A. aestuarina on tidal saltmarshes. Due to low morphological variation between syntopic congeners it is likely that many museum specimens of Aphrodes have been assigned to the wrong species and species identification in ecological and vector studies may also be questionable.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Integrating vibrational signals, mitochondrial DNA and morphology for species determination in the genus Aphrodes (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae)

Bluemel

Derlink

Pavlovčič

et al. 2014

Systematic Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These species are similar in morphological traits [Tishechkin, 1999], but partially differ in coloration. M. daurica is always green (Fig.…”

Section: Macropsis Flavida M Dauricamentioning

confidence: 95%

“…M. leporina and M. ochotonaria are cryptic species indistinguishable both in morphology and coloration [Tishechkin, 1999]. Their signals differ distinctly in temporal pattern (Figs 29,33), but share one similar component, a succession of high-amplitude 5,7;6,[8][9]14,16;15,17;[1][2][3][4]2,; 5-17 -oscillograms of male calling signals.…”

Section: Macropsis Flavida M Dauricamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Speciation in Macropsinae leafhoppers (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae) — the role of acoustic signal divergence and host plant shifts

Tishechkin

2015

Russian Entomological Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

по структуре призывных сигналов. Нестрого симпатрические и аллопатрические виды могут издавать сходные сигналы, т.к. у них разделение каналов акустической коммуникации происходит за счёт экологической или географической изоляции. Различия в окраске и/или строении гениталий формируются уже после возникновения географических или акустических барьеров, причём дивергенция по разным группам признаков может происходить независимо. В результате, в одних случаях внешне сходные виды различаются по морфологии гениталий, в других -виды, неразличимые по форме гениталий, различаются по окраске. Таким образом, именно паттерн призывных сигналов, а не окраска или строение гениталий является у мелких цикадовых ключевым элементом системы распознавания конспецифического полового партнёра. Переход на новые кормовые растения и географическая изоляция популяций, связанных с одним видом растений, по-видимому, представляют собой у цикадовых два основных механизма видообразования. Оба они могут реализовываться в разных группах близких видов даже в пределах одного рода или подсемейства.

show abstract

“…Presently, the large and diverse genus Macropsis Lewis, 1836 (Homoptera: Cicadellidae: Macropsinae) is well studied in Nearctic [Hamilton, 1983] and Northern Palaearctic [Tishechkin, 1999[Tishechkin, , 2003[Tishechkin, , 2015. North-Palaearctic species can be subdivided into several natural groups according to their host associations; these groups as a rule are also different in morphological traits and external appearance [Tishechkin, 2016].…”

Section: Macropsis Latiloratamentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of species of the genus Macropsidius Ribaut, 1952 (Homoptera: Cicadellidae: Macropsinae) of Russia and adjacent territories

Abstract: with main diagnostic characters and data on biology and distribution is provided. Illustrated key to species is given. The synonymy of M.

Cited by 11 publications

References 3 publications

Integrating vibrational signals, mitochondrial DNA and morphology for species determination in the genus Aphrodes (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae)

Integrating vibrational signals, mitochondrial DNA and morphology for species determination in the genus Aphrodes (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae)

Speciation in Macropsinae leafhoppers (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae) — the role of acoustic signal divergence and host plant shifts

A new species of the leafhopper genus Macropsis Lewis, 1836 (Homoptera: Cicadellidae: Macropsinae) from the United Arab Emirates

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About