2018
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of State-Space Models for Fisheries Science

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was mainly due to the difference in recruitment assumption, which matters when forecasting fish stocks. Estimating process errors in fisheries models should result in more robust parameters and derived outputs (Aeberhard et al, ) even if process errors are misspecified or their variances underestimated (EM1, EM1b) because this more closely reflects the emergent complexity of the biological processes in fisheries ecosystems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was mainly due to the difference in recruitment assumption, which matters when forecasting fish stocks. Estimating process errors in fisheries models should result in more robust parameters and derived outputs (Aeberhard et al, ) even if process errors are misspecified or their variances underestimated (EM1, EM1b) because this more closely reflects the emergent complexity of the biological processes in fisheries ecosystems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to multispecies models, there is an incentive to develop state‐space stock assessment models that account for uncertainty in sampling that generates observations (observations errors) and also in unobserved biological processes responsible for stochastic changes in the population over time (process errors). These state‐space models treat the process errors as random effects which are integrated out to estimate fixed effects parameters from the marginal likelihood of the observations (Aeberhard, Mills Flemming, & Nielsen, ). By estimating both types of errors, these state‐space models become a more realistic illustration of the uncertainty that exists in our understanding of the fisheries systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By explicitly modeling both process and measurement error, we were able to monitor canopy dynamics, despite temporal variation in Landsat data. While state-space models have been applied to analyze noisy time series for a range of fields, from fisheries science (Aeberhard et al 2018) to epidemiology (Cauchemez and Ferguson 2008), this modeling approach is not widely used for Earth observation applications. Instead, remote sensing has focused more on minimizing measurement error than on modeling ecological process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tested the hypothesis of metapopulation structure within the EEC and estimated the level of mixing between sub-populations. For that purpose, we developped a capture-recapture model (Royle et al 2013;McCrea & Morgan 2014) built in a state-space model framework (recently reviewed in Aeberhard et al 2018 in the context of fisheries) to estimate adult and subadult movement probabilities. Finally, based on our observations, we consider the implications for management of the common sole stock in the EEC (and more widely) of acknowledging and incorporating population substructure in management and assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%