2022
DOI: 10.1075/jlp.22141.li
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Statham (2022): Critical discourse analysis: A practical introduction to power in language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This discourse highlights the misuse of power, dominance, and inequality within social and political contexts (as cited in Gyollai, 2020). Recent studies by Klein and Johnson (2023) further underline this by analyzing power dynamics in political discourses using CDA. Brown (2023) also underscores the importance of using CDA for analyzing ideologies in literature.…”
Section: Conflict and Critical Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discourse highlights the misuse of power, dominance, and inequality within social and political contexts (as cited in Gyollai, 2020). Recent studies by Klein and Johnson (2023) further underline this by analyzing power dynamics in political discourses using CDA. Brown (2023) also underscores the importance of using CDA for analyzing ideologies in literature.…”
Section: Conflict and Critical Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It falls into the typical multimodal discourse with more than one semiotic mode involved. It can be often regarded as doing communicative work which essentially upholds and strengthens the stratified organization of media (Simon, 2022), whereas it is often considered as a genre which is not worthy of serious commentary and criticism (Barajas, 2000). However, the mainstream of multimodality in discourse analysis (Kress & van Leeuwen, 2001;Machin, 2007) and the development of frameworks and approaches of discourse analysis relevant to visual communication enable the viewers to appreciate the complexity of discourse features and different levels of communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%