2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-019-02270-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of statistical model calibration and validation—from the perspective of uncertainty structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 266 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Travel time records for individual arms obtained from video recordings were used as calibration data. Calibration was verified using a GEH statistical equation, Equation (3), as described in [54,55]. There are 2 cut-off values for GEH-5.0 and 10.0.…”
Section: Modelling Methodology and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Travel time records for individual arms obtained from video recordings were used as calibration data. Calibration was verified using a GEH statistical equation, Equation (3), as described in [54,55]. There are 2 cut-off values for GEH-5.0 and 10.0.…”
Section: Modelling Methodology and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kolmogorov-Smirnov test: measures the vertical distance between two Cumulative Distribution Functions (CDFs); Anderson-Darling test: evaluates if a sample comes from a population characterized by a specific distribution [57]. A downside of statistical model validation is that statistical testing is mainly concerned with stationary distributions [58], which limits its effectiveness in investigating the transients behavior of the system. For example, one can straightforwardly utilize the T-test to validate a finite element method (FEM) model for a static structural analysis against experimental evidence.…”
Section: ) Statistical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A confidence level of around 70% is considered low, but 95% is a very good match. A confidence level of 90% is therefore recommended [44,45].…”
Section: Calibration and Validation Of Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%