Review of systematic reviews about the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions to improve sleep quality in insomnia

Niet, G.J. De; Tiemens, Bea; Kloos, Margot; Hutschemaekers, G.J.M.

doi:10.1111/j.1744-1609.2009.00142.x

Cited by 43 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The results from this search were combined with the results from 2 reviews of reviews of the topic (85,86). As well as the many descriptive systematic reviews in this area, quantitative meta-analyses have found behavioral interventions for sleep to be efficacious in children (87), CBT-i to be moderately efficacious for anxiety symptoms (88), and CBT-i to be efficacious when delivered in computerized or groupbased formats (89,90).…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Insomnia

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Insomnia

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The past few decades have given rise to a handful of such studies in several clinical areas including lifestyle interventions,4 interventions to improve mental health,5 homeopathy,6 medical education,7 spinal manipulation,8 sleep medicine,9 and cancer,10 among others. Each of these reviews of reviews is focused on a specific clinical question.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature

Samaan¹,

Mbuagbaw²,

Kosa³

et al. 2013

JMDH

103

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundReporting guidelines have been available for the past 17 years since the inception of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement in 1996. These guidelines were developed to improve the quality of reporting of studies in medical literature. Despite the widespread availability of these guidelines, the quality of reporting of medical literature remained suboptimal. In this study, we assess the current adherence practice to reporting guidelines; determine key factors associated with better adherence to these guidelines; and provide recommendations to enhance adherence to reporting guidelines for future studies.MethodsWe undertook a systematic scoping review of systematic reviews of adherence to reporting guidelines across different clinical areas and study designs. We searched four electronic databases (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Embase, and Medline) from January 1996 to September 2012. Studies were included if they addressed adherence to one of the following guidelines: Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT), Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), Quality of Reporting of Meta-analysis (QUOROM), Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonrandomized Designs (TREND), Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). A protocol for this study was devised. A literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed independently by two authors in duplicate. This study reporting follows the PRISMA guidelines.ResultsOur search retrieved 5159 titles, of which 50 were eligible. Overall, 86.0% of studies reported suboptimal levels of adherence to reporting guidelines. Factors associated with better adherence included journal impact factor and endorsement of guidelines, publication date, funding source, multisite studies, pharmacological interventions and larger studies.ConclusionReporting guidelines in the clinical literature are important to improve the standards of reporting of clinical studies; however, adherence to these guidelines remains suboptimal. Action is therefore needed to enhance the adherence to these standards. Strategies to enhance adherence include journal editorial policies endorsing these guidelines.

show abstract

“…Addressing sleep disorders could improve performance and the general health of the athlete 111. Psychological strategies including CBT,119 self-hypnosis120 and mindfulness-based stress reduction121 show significant potential to improve sleep in non-athletes. CBT for insomnia has demonstrated efficacy 122–124.…”

Section: Non-pharmacological Pain Management Strategies In Elite Athlmentioning

confidence: 99%

International Olympic Committee consensus statement on pain management in elite athletes

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pain is a common problem among elite athletes and is frequently associated with sport injury. Both pain and injury interfere with the performance of elite athletes. There are currently no evidence-based or consensusbased guidelines for the management of pain in elite athletes. Typically, pain management consists of the provision of analgesics, rest and physical therapy. More appropriately, a treatment strategy should address all contributors to pain including underlying pathophysiology, biomechanical abnormalities and psychosocial issues, and should employ therapies providing optimal benefit and minimal harm. To advance the development of a more standardised, evidenceinformed approach to pain management in elite athletes, an IOC Consensus Group critically evaluated the current state of the science and practice of pain management in sport and prepared recommendations for a more unified approach to this important topic.

show abstract

Review of systematic reviews about the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions to improve sleep quality in insomnia

Cited by 43 publications

References 28 publications

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Insomnia

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Insomnia

A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature

International Olympic Committee consensus statement on pain management in elite athletes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About