2022
DOI: 10.58506/ajstss.v1i2.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

review of techniques for morphological analysis in natural language processing

Abstract: Natural language is a crucial tool to facilitate communication in our day-to-day activities. This can be achieved either in text or speech forms. Natural language processing (NLP) involves making computers understand and process natural language. NLP has enhanced the way humans interact with computers, from having computers use speech to talk to humans as well as having computers translate human speech. Apart from speech, computers also create and understand sentences in natural language in a process called mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While many studies have successfully employed NNbased methods for POS tagging tasks, it has mainly focused on models including Word, character, and combined representation of both [16]. This requires word embeddings pretrained on extensively large and high-quality corpora, and only a limited number of studies have addressed the OOV, ambiguity and polysemy issues [17]. Nonetheless, the investigation into POS tagging tasks for Uzbek, Kyrgyz, and Uyghur remains constrained, because of data scarcity and the distinctive linguistic characteristics of these languages.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many studies have successfully employed NNbased methods for POS tagging tasks, it has mainly focused on models including Word, character, and combined representation of both [16]. This requires word embeddings pretrained on extensively large and high-quality corpora, and only a limited number of studies have addressed the OOV, ambiguity and polysemy issues [17]. Nonetheless, the investigation into POS tagging tasks for Uzbek, Kyrgyz, and Uyghur remains constrained, because of data scarcity and the distinctive linguistic characteristics of these languages.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%