2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of the operational flexibility and emissions of gas- and coal-fired power plants in a future with growing renewables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
172
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 394 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
172
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Like coal, natural gas can provide a steady supply to urban and industrial areas but crucially, gas fired plants are also a better fit to variable renewable energies, thanks to their higher operational flexibility and lower capital cost. With the deployment of the huge renewable energy potential in Africa, most of which is variable and not dispatchable (like solar and wind), there will be a need for dispatchable power plants which will operate in mid-load: it is here that gas has an advantage over coal (Gonzalez-Salazar et al 2018). Gas fired power generation is often cheaper than coal based power generation, in fact the investment cost of a gas fired power plant are half (combined cycle) or a quarter (gas turbine) compared to a coal fired power plant.…”
Section: Natural Gas Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like coal, natural gas can provide a steady supply to urban and industrial areas but crucially, gas fired plants are also a better fit to variable renewable energies, thanks to their higher operational flexibility and lower capital cost. With the deployment of the huge renewable energy potential in Africa, most of which is variable and not dispatchable (like solar and wind), there will be a need for dispatchable power plants which will operate in mid-load: it is here that gas has an advantage over coal (Gonzalez-Salazar et al 2018). Gas fired power generation is often cheaper than coal based power generation, in fact the investment cost of a gas fired power plant are half (combined cycle) or a quarter (gas turbine) compared to a coal fired power plant.…”
Section: Natural Gas Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coal fired units delivering the flexibility services will need to run more frequently at partial loads by ramping up or down, or to be started up and shut down [16]. The start-up time, minimum load, and ramp rate of coal fired units are the key factors for their operational flexibility [13,17,18], which usually increase their operation and maintenance costs [19]. The startup of a unit increases the extra cost of the power generation [13], mainly for heating up its components and steam cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The startup of a unit increases the extra cost of the power generation [13], mainly for heating up its components and steam cycle. According to the shutdown period of a unit before its startup, there are generally there types of startups, which are hot startup (less than 8 hours since unit shutdown), warm startup (between 8 and 48 hours since unit shutdown) and cold startup (more than 48 hours since unit shutdown), and their definitions can vary between manufacturers [13,17,20]. The startups of the units delivering the flexibility are often hot startups, or warm startups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thermal power plant performance can be evaluated through energetic performance criteria, which are electrical power and thermal efficiency. In recent decades, exergy analysis of plant has been found as a useful method in the design, evaluation, optimization and improvement of thermal power plants [3][4][5]. Exergy analysis helps in finding the losses taking place in a system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%