2023
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-023-11284-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of the stability analyses for slide-head toppling failure mechanisms: a different perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tilt tests can estimate the transition from stable to unstable slope angles. However, Samson et al [38] report that its primary disadvantage is testing steeper slope angles greater than the stable-unstable transition threshold boundary, making it unsuitable for low-lying slope angles.…”
Section: Tilt Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tilt tests can estimate the transition from stable to unstable slope angles. However, Samson et al [38] report that its primary disadvantage is testing steeper slope angles greater than the stable-unstable transition threshold boundary, making it unsuitable for low-lying slope angles.…”
Section: Tilt Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review discussed the commonly adopted computer programs for investigating rainfall seepage in unsaturated slopes. A review of the modelling approaches in slope stability was conducted by Samson et al [38] with a focus on block toppling and highlighted milestones in the modelling techniques. However, the study emphasised chronological developments in physical, modelling and analytical methods on block toppling stability analysis, with limited attention to the methods and requirements in numerical and physical modelling in terms of slope materials, scaling laws and physical test apparatus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%