Review of the top 5 geriatrics studies of 2018-2019

Sadowski, Cheryl A.; Bharadia, Morgan; Bowles, Susan K.; Patel, Tejal

doi:10.1177/17151635211018725

Cited by 2 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The six literature updates were published between 2017 and 2021 from Canada and the United States of America [12][13][14][15][16][17] (Supplemental 3). Two investigator groups authored two updates each.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two literature updates specified the journals they consulted for articles, including the New England Journal of Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association, Neurology, the Journal of the American Geriatric Society, Age and Aging, the Canadian Journal of Geriatrics, and the Journals of Gerontology. 14,15 One literature update obtained article suggestions from social media, which included a research blog from the American Geriatric Society. 12 One literature update consulted McMaster Evidence Alerts, an online database of research articles appraised for high quality evidence.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sadowski et al was the most detailed in reporting their methodology for conducting their literature update, from (1) literature search, (2) expert/academic clinician selection, (3) frontline clinician selection, and (4) summarizing the articles. 15 One update stated all authors participated in the article selection, 13 and one update stated consensus was used between the study authors. 14 Three updates did not report their method of article selection.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[12][13][14] Three literature updates were published in a peer-reviewed journal only. [15][16][17] Learning outcomes were not reported in any of the three literature updates that were first presented in a conference. [12][13][14]…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

How to conduct an annual literature update for top articles relevant to clinical practice in geriatrics: A scoping review

Lee,

Uleryk,

Ratnapalan

2024

J American Geriatrics Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundClinical educators in geriatrics are often tasked with presenting a literature update at annual conferences and scientific meetings, which is a highly regarded continuing medical education (CME) activity. Preparation of an annual literature update cannot rely on bibliometric analysis due to time lag and poor correlation between bibliometrics and expert opinion on clinical relevance. The methodology of how top research articles of the year are selected and presented is not often reported.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review for published reports of a curated selection of recent articles critically appraised for high impact to clinical practice in general geriatrics, published from 2010 to 2022.ResultsSix annual literature updates were included for study. Three updates detailed their article sources, ranging from a survey of clinicians, consulting seven individual journals, searching up to four bibliographic databases, scanning social media outlets, and reviewing previous literature updates. One update reported a detailed method of article selection and consensus development. Critical appraisal of articles followed a structured reporting of clinical context, methods, results, and a statement of clinical implication or bottom line. Three of the six updates' results were disseminated in an annual conference update and did not evaluate learning outcomes of the audience. We mapped the results on a four‐step framework of article search, selection, critical appraisal, and dissemination of knowledge.ConclusionsEducators in geriatrics consult numerous article sources spanning multiple journals, databases, social media, and peer suggestions to create an annual literature update. The methodology of article search and selection is inconsistently described. In this exciting area of CME, we encourage educators to develop a framework for conducting annual literature updates in geriatrics and expand its scholarship.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

How to conduct an annual literature update for top articles relevant to clinical practice in geriatrics: A scoping review

Lee,

Uleryk,

Ratnapalan

2024

J American Geriatrics Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Refs. [ 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 , 182 , 183 , 184 , 185 , 186 , 187 , 188 , 189 , 190 , 191 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 , 196 ,…”

unclassified

Assessment Tools of Biopsychosocial Frailty Dimensions in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Narrative Review

Luca

Femminella

Patalano

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Frailty is a complex interplay between several factors, including physiological changes in ageing, multimorbidities, malnutrition, living environment, genetics, and lifestyle. Early screening for frailty risk factors in community-dwelling older people allows for preventive interventions on the clinical and social determinants of frailty, which allows adverse events to be avoided. By conducting a narrative review of the literature employing the International Narrative Systematic Assessment tool, the authors aimed to develop an updated framework for the main measurement tools to assess frailty risks in older adults, paying attention to use in the community and primary care settings. This search focused on the biopsychosocial domains of frailty that are covered in the SUNFRAIL tool. The study selected 178 reviews (polypharmacy: 20; nutrition: 13; physical activity: 74; medical visits: 0; falls: 39; cognitive decline: 12; loneliness: 15; social support: 5; economic constraints: 0) published between January 2010 and December 2021. Within the selected reviews, 123 assessment tools were identified (polypharmacy: 15; nutrition: 15; physical activity: 25; medical visits: 0; falls: 26; cognitive decline: 18; loneliness: 9; social support: 15; economic constraints: 0). The narrative review allowed us to evaluate assessment tools of frailty domains to be adopted for multidimensional health promotion and prevention interventions in community and primary care.

show abstract

Review of the top 5 geriatrics studies of 2018-2019

Cited by 2 publications

References 31 publications

How to conduct an annual literature update for top articles relevant to clinical practice in geriatrics: A scoping review

How to conduct an annual literature update for top articles relevant to clinical practice in geriatrics: A scoping review

Assessment Tools of Biopsychosocial Frailty Dimensions in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Narrative Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About