2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2022.101549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of transoral odontoidectomy. Where do we stand? Technical note and a single-center experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surgical indications included rheumatoid cervical pannus (10%), degenerative conditions (30%), pseudogout (10%), basilar invagination (30%), and malignancy (20%). In this patient group, a neurological improvement of 60% was reported, while 20% of patients remained stable during clinical follow-up, supporting its use despite being a less commonly performed procedure 16 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Surgical indications included rheumatoid cervical pannus (10%), degenerative conditions (30%), pseudogout (10%), basilar invagination (30%), and malignancy (20%). In this patient group, a neurological improvement of 60% was reported, while 20% of patients remained stable during clinical follow-up, supporting its use despite being a less commonly performed procedure 16 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Some cases required odontoidectomy after the posterior procedure, and the gold standard of ventral decompression at the CVJ, open transoral approach, was considered. Many authors have reported the disadvantages of the transoral approach [3], which include a limited operative view and a deep working distance. In addition, the transoral approach is associated with several risks, such as contamination by normal oral flora, dehiscence of the surgical wound, alteration in phonation, tongue edema, the potential need for prolonged intubation or tracheostomy, the requirement of avoiding oral intake, and postoperative enteral tube feeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%